Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30104320›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Association between subjective tinnitus and cognitive performance: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nathan A Clarke, Michael A Akeroyd, Helen Henshaw, Derek J Hoare

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Clinical characteristics of subjective idiopathic tinnitus and preliminarily analyses for the effect of tinnitus multielement integration sound therapy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan A ClarkeMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-1872
Michael A AkeroydMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Helen HenshawNational Institute of Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0547-4403
Derek J HoareNational Institute of Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1206/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00010/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSubjective tinnitus is very common and has a number of comorbid associations including depression, sleep disturbance and concentration difficulties. Concentration difficulties may be observable in people with tinnitus through poorer behavioural performance in tasks thought to measure specific cognitive domains such as attention and memory (ie, cognitive performance). Several reviews have discussed the association between tinnitus and cognition; however, none to date have investigated the association between tinnitus and cognitive performance through meta-analysis with reference to an established theoretical taxonomy. Furthermore, there has been little overlap between sets of studies that have been included in previous reviews, potentially contributing to the typically mixed findings that are reported. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review aims to comprehensively review the literature using an established theoretical taxonomy and quantitatively synthesise relevant data to determine associations between subjective tinnitus and cognitive performance. Methods are reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. All study designs will be eligible for inclusion with no date restrictions on searches. Studies eligible for inclusion must contain adult participants (≥18 years) with subjective tinnitus and a behavioural measure of cognitive performance. Meta-analysis will be reported via correlation for the association between tinnitus and cognitive performance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. Findings will be reported in a student thesis, at national and international , ear, nose and throat/audiology conferences and by peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018085528.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionTinnitusAttentionCognitionHumansMemoryMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topicattentionaudiologycognitionentmemorytinnitus

Identifiers

PMID30104320
PMCPMC6091911
OpenAlexW2885168709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.