ArticleClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2018
Outcome of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Systemic Light-Chain Amyloidosis Associated With Deletion of 17p.
Article in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of Long-Term Benefit From High Dose Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in AL Amyloidosis.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- The molecular landscape of AL amyloidosis.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- AL Amyloidosis: Current Treatment and Outcomes.Advances in hematology · 2025Review
- Light-chain amyloidosis with concomitant symptomatic myeloma (CRAB-SLiM features): clinical characteristics, cytogenetic abnormalities, and outcomes.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of native T1 and extracellular volume in patients with immunoglubin light-chain amyloidosis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- The Landscape of Cytogenetic Aberrations in Light-Chain Amyloidosis with or without Coexistent Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Bad players in AL amyloidosis in the current era of treatment.Expert review of hematology · 2023Article
- Biomarkers in AL Amyloidosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Genetic pathogenesis of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: basic characteristics and clinical applications.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2021Review
- Depth of response prior to autologous stem cell transplantation predicts survival in light chain amyloidosis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2021Article
- AL amyloidosis: The effect of fluorescent in situ hybridization abnormalities on organ involvement and survival.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Updates in the Diagnosis and Management of AL Amyloidosis.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020Review
- New developments in diagnosis, risk assessment and management in systemic amyloidosis.Blood reviews · 2020Review
- Amyloidosis in Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2019Review
- Approach to a patient with cardiac amyloidosis.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDeletion 17p (del 17p) portends a poor prognosis in myeloma, but its significance in light-chain amyloidosis is unknown. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe identified patients with light-chain amyloidosis and del 17p at diagnosis, and analyzed presenting characteristics, treatments, and clinical outcomes. All had baseline biopsy results showing amyloid and serologic and marrow studies, including standard fluorescence in-situ hybridization determinations of del 17p using commercial probes. Consensus criteria for hematologic and organ involvement, progression, and response were used. Kaplan-Meier (log rank) analyses and Cox regression analysis of baseline variables were used to identify predictors of overall and progression-free survival (PFS). Six-month landmark analyses were performed to assess the impact of treatment-related variables.
resultsWe identified 44 patients from 7 countries with median marrow and del 17p plasma cells of 22% (range, 3%-100%) and 30% (2%-93%). Ninety-five percent had cardiac involvement, including 44% stage III. Two-thirds of the patients initially received bortezomib-based therapy. Forty-nine percent of patients experienced complete response or very good partial response, with median time to best response of 4 months (range, 1-28 months). Median overall survival and PFS were 49 and 32 months. Cardiac stage and hematologic response were the key predictors of outcomes. Patients with > 50% and ≤ 50% del 17p in clonal plasma cells had median survivals of 28 and 52 months, respectively (P = .08). In landmark analyses, only hematologic response predicted both overall survival and PFS.
conclusionCardiac stage, hematologic response, and del 17p percentage impact outcomes in these cases. Emphasis should be placed on optimizing supportive care and achieving a deep hematologic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.