ReviewUrologic oncology2018
Molecular correlates of intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer.
Review in Urologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Impact of Germline Pathogenic Variants in High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk score with KLK3 SNP-SNP interaction pairs for predicting prostate cancer aggressiveness.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- From pathways to prediction: a comparative machine learning framework for prostate cancer survival.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Radiogenomic Profiling of Prostate Tumors prior to External Beam Radiotherapy Converges on a Transcriptomic Signature of TGF-β Activity Driving Tumor Recurrence.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Observational
- Patterns of intra- and intertumor phenotypic heterogeneity in lethal prostate cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
- Clonal relationships of adjacent Gleason pattern 3 and Gleason pattern 5 lesions in Gleason Scores 3+5=8 and 5+3=8.Human pathology · 2022Article
- Review
- Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Clinicopathologic parameters, including Gleason score, remain the most validated prognostic factors for patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa). However, patients of the same risk groups have exhibited heterogeneity of disease outcomes. To improve risk classification, multiple molecular risk classifiers have been developed, which were designed to inform beyond existing clinicopathologic classifiers. Alterations affecting tumor suppressors and oncogenes, such as PTEN, MYC, BRCA2, and TP53, which have been long associated with aggressive PCa, demonstrated grade-dependent frequency of alterations in localized PCas. In addition to these genetic hallmarks, several RNA-based commercial tests have been recently developed to help identify men who would benefit from earlier interventions. Large genomic studies also correlate germline genetic alterations and epigenetic features with adverse outcomes, further strengthening the link between the risk of metastasis and a stepwise accumulation of driver molecular lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.