Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103772›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroinflammation2018

RAS modulation prevents progressive cognitive impairment after experimental stroke: a randomized, blinded preclinical trial.

Heba A Ahmed, Tauheed Ishrat, Bindu Pillai, Abdelrahman Y Fouda, Mohammed A Sayed, Wael Eldahshan, Jennifer L Waller, Adviye Ergul, Susan C Fagan

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Current updates on latest basic research of scientific relevance in hypertensive dementia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Angiotensin ATPharmacological reviews · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Heba A AhmedProgram in Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center and University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, HM Bldg., 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Tauheed IshratDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Bindu PillaiProgram in Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center and University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, HM Bldg., 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Abdelrahman Y FoudaProgram in Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center and University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, HM Bldg., 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Mohammed A SayedProgram in Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center and University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, HM Bldg., 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Wael EldahshanProgram in Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center and University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, HM Bldg., 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Jennifer L WallerDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Adviye ErgulProgram in Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center and University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, HM Bldg., 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Susan C FaganProgram in Clinical and Experimental Therapeutics, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center and University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, HM Bldg., 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA. sfagan@uga.edu.
Augusta University · USUniversity of Georgia · USCharlie Norwood VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Vascular Injury and Recovery in Diabetic Ischemic StrokeR01NS083559 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ERGUL, ADVIYE · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Mechanisms of Vascular Protection after Acute StrokeR01NS063965 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI FAGAN, SUSAN C · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
Angiotensin receptor agonism to promote recovery after strokeR21NS088016 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI FAGAN, SUSAN C · 2014 to 2015
$645k
BLRD VA I01 BX000347BLRD VA I01 BX000891NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS063965NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083559NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS088016NINDS NIH HHS RO1 NS063965NINDS NIH HHS RO1 NS083559VA Merit Review BX000347VA Merit Review BX000891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the aging population, the prevalence and incidence of cerebrovascular disease will continue to rise, as well as the number of individuals with vascular cognitive impairment/dementia (VCID). No specific FDA-approved treatments for VCID exist. Although clinical evidence supports that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) prevent cognitive decline in older adults, whether ARBs have a similar effect on VCID after stroke is unknown. Moreover, these agents reduce BP, which is undesirable in the acute stroke period, so we believe that giving C21 in this acute phase or delaying ARB administration would enable us to achieve the neurovascular benefits without the risk of unintended and potentially dangerous, acute BP lowering.

methodsThe aim of our study was to determine the impact of candesartan (ARB) or compound-21 (an angiotensin type 2 receptor--AT2R--agonist) on long-term cognitive function post-stroke, in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). We hypothesized that AT2R stimulation, either directly with C21, or indirectly by blocking the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) with candesartan, initiated after stroke, would reduce cognitive impairment. Animals were subjected to a 60-min transient middle cerebral artery occlusion and randomly assigned to either saline/C21 monotherapy, for the full study duration (30 days), or given sequential therapy starting with saline/C21 (7 days) followed by candesartan for the remainder of the study (21 days). Outcome measures included sensorimotor/cognitive-function, amyloid-β determination, and histopathologic analyses.

resultsTreatment with RAS modulators effectively preserved cognitive function, reduced cytotoxicity, and prevented chronic-reactive microgliosis in SHRs, post-stroke. These protective effects were apparent even when treatment was delayed up to 7 days post-stroke and were independent of blood pressure and β-amyloid accumulation.

conclusionCollectively, our findings demonstrate that RAS modulators effectively prevent cognitive impairment after stroke, even when treatment is delayed.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureCell HypoxiaCells, CulturedCognitive DysfunctionDisease Models, AnimalDouble-Blind MethodEndothelial CellsEpoetin AlfaHippocampusHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Antihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundscandesartanEpoetin AlfaN-butyloxycarbonyl-3-(4-imidazol-1-ylmethylphenyl)-5-isobutylthiophene-2-sulfonamidePeptide FragmentsSulfonamidesTetrazolesThiophenesAngiotensin modulatorsCognitive-impairmentHypertensionStroke

Identifiers

PMID30103772
PMCPMC6090822
OpenAlexW2886184329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.