Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103767›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2018

Survey for major viruses in commercial Vitis vinifera wine grapes in Ontario.

Huogen Xiao, Mehdi Shabanian, Clayton Moore, Caihong Li, Baozhong Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huogen XiaoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Mehdi ShabanianDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Clayton MooreDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Caihong LiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Baozhong MengDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. bmeng@uoguelph.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-8578

Funding

OMAFRA-UoG Partnerships program 030104OMAFRA-UoG Partnerships program 030122Ontario Grape and Wine Research Inc. 001300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the Ontario grape and wine industry has experienced outbreaks of viral diseases across the province. Little is known about the prevalence of viruses and viral diseases in Ontario. Since 2015, we have conducted large-scale surveys for major viruses in commercial wine grapes in order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and severity of viral diseases in Ontario.

methodsA total of 657 composite leaf samples representing 3285 vines collected from 137 vine blocks of 33 vineyards from three appellations: Niagara Peninsula, Lake Erie North Shore and Prince Edward County. These samples covered six major red cultivars and five major white grape cultivars. Using a multiplex RT-PCR format, we tested these samples for 17 viruses including those involved in all major viral diseases of the grapevine, such as five grapevine leafroll-associated viruses (GLRaV-1, 2, 3, 4, 7), grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV), grapevine Pinot gris virus (GPGV), grapevine rupestris stem sitting-associated virus (GRSPaV), grapevine virus A (GVA), grapevine virus B (GVB), grapevine fleck virus (GFkV), arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), tomato ringspot virus (ToRSV), trapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV), among others.

resultsFourteen of the 17 viruses were detected from these samples and the predominant viruses are GRSPaV, GLRaV-3, GFkV, GPGV and GRBaV with an incidence of 84.0, 47.9, 21.8, 21.6 and 18.3%, respectively. As expected, mixed infections with multiple viruses are common. 95.6% of the samples included in the survey were infected with at least one virus; 67% of the samples with 2-4 viruses and 4.7% of the samples with 5-6 viruses. The major grape cultivars all tested positive for these major viruses. The results also suggested that the use of infected planting material may have been one of the chief factors responsible for the recent outbreaks of viral diseases across the province.

conclusionsThis is the first such comprehensive survey for grapevine viruses in Ontario and one of the most extensive surveys ever conducted in Canada. The recent outbreaks of viral diseases in Ontario vineyards were likely caused by GLRaV-3, GRBV and GPGV. Findings from this survey provides a baseline for the grape and wine industry in developing strategies for managing grapevine viral diseases in Ontario vineyards.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesCoinfectionMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionOntarioPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesRNA, ViralVitisWineRNA, ViralGrapevine fleckGrapevine leafrollGrapevine red blotchGrapevine rugose woodGrapevine viral diseaseOntarioRT-PCRVirus surveyVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID30103767
PMCPMC6090770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.