Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103734›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

A multi-centre quality improvement project to reduce the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): study protocol.

Posy Bidwell, Ranee Thakar, Nick Sevdalis, Louise Silverton, Vivienne Novis, Alexandra Hellyer, Megan Kelsey, Jan van der Meulen, Ipek Gurol-Urganci

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Female pelvic floor protection-Where do we have to go?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: From the fear of malpractice to a quality indicator of a center.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  7. Care pathways and anorectal evaluation for obstetric anal sphincter injury-related incontinence: A UK survey of obstetricians.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Posy BidwellRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK. pbidwell@rcog.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8506-9880
Ranee ThakarCroydon Health Services NHS Trust, Croydon, UK.
Nick SevdalisHealth Service & Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.
Louise SilvertonRoyal College of Midwives, London, UK.
Vivienne NovisRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.
Alexandra HellyerRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.
Megan KelseyRoyal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.
Jan van der MeulenLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ipek Gurol-UrganciLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCroydon Health Services NHS Trust · GBKing's College London · GBRoyal College of Midwives · GB

Funding

The Health Foundation, UK 7674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThird and fourth degree perineal tears, or obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI), sustained during childbirth can result in anal incontinence and psychosocial problems which require ongoing treatment. Within the English National Health System (NHS) reported rates of OASI have gradually increased. In response, a care bundle was developed incorporating four elements: 1) antenatal information to women, 2) manual perineal protection during all vaginal births, 3) episiotomy to be performed with a 60° mediolateral angle at crowning (when clinically indicated) and 4) perineal examination (including per rectum) after childbirth. Implementation of the OASI Care Bundle is aided by a skills development module and an awareness campaign. The project is a collaboration between two national professional bodies, an NHS hospital trust and an academic institution.

methodsImplementation of the OASI Care Bundle will be evaluated using a stepped-wedge design. From January 2017 sixteen maternity units across England, Wales and Scotland will participate in the study over a 15-month period, with sequential roll-out of the intervention in four blocks (regions) of four units. The primary clinical outcome is OASI rate. Regression analysis will adjust for differences in organisational characteristics and obstetric risk factors in women who gave birth before and after implementation of the care bundle. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with clinicians will evaluate the feasibility of integrating the care bundle into routine practice. Interviews with women will explore the acceptability of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This protocol outlines the evaluation of our quality improvement project which aims to prevent OASI using a bundle of evidence-based interventions that are each widely used in practice. The OASI project aims to 1) standardise practice to prevent OASI in a way that is acceptable to clinicians and women and 2) identify the barriers and enablers associated with upscaling interventions within maternity units. If found to be effective, feasible and acceptable, the OASI Care Bundle will be shared with a range of audiences using the communication channels available to the professional bodies.

trial registrationThe OASI Project was retrospectively registered on the ISCTRN12143325 database date assigned 03/10/2017.

Indexed as

Anal CanalDelivery, ObstetricEnglandEpisiotomyFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansImplementation ScienceIncidenceLacerationsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPatient Care BundlesPatient Education as TopicPerineumPhysical ExaminationPregnancyCare bundleChildbirthFourth degree tearsOASIObstetric anal sphincter injuryPerineal traumaQuality improvementThird degree tears

Identifiers

PMID30103734
PMCPMC6090598
OpenAlexW2887104501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.