Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103677›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2018

Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study.

Anne Lambert-Kerzner, Charles Maynard, Marina McCreight, Amy Ladebue, Katherine M Williams, Kelty B Fehling, Steven M Bradley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Lambert-KerznerVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. Anne.Lambert-Kerzner@ucdenver.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-287X
Charles MaynardVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Marina McCreightFoundation for Health Care Quality Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amy LadebueVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Katherine M WilliamsVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Kelty B FehlingVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Steven M BradleyVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System · USMinneapolis Heart Institute Foundation · USColorado School of Public Health · USFoundation for Health Care Quality · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of inappropriate elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has decreased over time, but hospital-level variation in the use of inappropriate PCI persists. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) guidelines may inform efforts to improve elective PCI appropriateness.

methodsAll hospitals performing PCI in Washington State were categorized by their use of inappropriate elective PCI in 2010 to 2013. Semi-structured, qualitative telephone interviews were then conducted with 17 individual interviews at 13 sites in Washington State to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the AUC guidelines. An inductive and deductive, team-based analytical approach, drawing primarily on Matrix analysis was performed to identify factors affecting implementation of the AUC.

resultsSpecific facilitators were identified that supported successful implementation of the AUC. These included collaborative catheterization laboratory environments that allow all staff to participate with questions and opinions; ongoing AUC education with catheterization laboratory teams and referring providers; internal AUC peer review processes; interventional cardiologist be directly involved with the pre-procedural review process; checklist-based algorithms for pre-procedural documentation; systems redesign to include insurance companies; and AUC educational information with patients. Barriers to implementation of the AUC included external pressures, such as competition for patients, and the lack of shared medical records with sites that referred patients for coronary angiography.

conclusionsThe identified facilitators enabled sites to successfully implement the AUC. Catheterization laboratories struggling to successfully implement the AUC may consider utilizing these strategies to improve their processes to improve patient selection for elective PCI.

Indexed as

Cardiology Service, HospitalEducation, Medical, ContinuingElective Surgical ProceduresGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansInservice TrainingMyocardial IschemiaPatient Care TeamPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Qualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationAppropriate use criteriaIschemic heart diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionQualitative

Identifiers

PMID30103677
PMCPMC6205154
OpenAlexW2885679975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.