Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103505›Full record

ArticleGenes2018

Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion.

Sonia M Rodríguez-Ruano, Manuel Martín-Vivaldi, Juan M Peralta-Sánchez, Ana B García-Martín, Ángela Martínez-García, Juan J Soler, Eva Valdivia, Manuel Martínez-Bueno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Great Tit (Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sonia M Rodríguez-RuanoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain. soniamrr@ugr.es.ORCID 0000-0001-6863-717X
Manuel Martín-VivaldiDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain. mmv@ugr.es.
Juan M Peralta-SánchezDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain. jmps@ugr.es.
Ana B García-MartínDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain. a.gm82@hotmail.es.
Ángela Martínez-GarcíaEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC), E-04120 Almeria, Spain. angela@eeza.csic.es.
Juan J SolerUnidad Asociada Coevolución: Cucos, Hospedadores y Bacterias Simbiontes, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain. jsoler@eeza.csic.es.ORCID 0000-0003-2990-1489
Eva ValdiviaDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain. evavm@ugr.es.
Manuel Martínez-BuenoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain. mmartine@ugr.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The uropygial gland of hoopoe nestlings and nesting females hosts bacterial symbionts that cause changes in the characteristics of its secretion, including an increase of its antimicrobial activity. These changes occur only in nesting individuals during the breeding season, possibly associated with the high infection risk experienced during the stay in the hole-nests. However, the knowledge on hoopoes uropygial gland microbial community dynamics is quite limited and based so far on culture-dependent and molecular fingerprinting studies. In this work, we sampled wild and captive hoopoes of different sex, age, and reproductive status, and studied their microbiota using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and pyrosequencing. Surprisingly, we found a complex bacterial community in all individuals (including non-nesting ones) during the breeding season. Nevertheless, dark secretions from nesting hoopoes harbored significantly higher bacterial density than white secretions from breeding males and both sexes in winter. We hypothesize that bacterial proliferation may be host-regulated in phases of high infection risk (i.e., nesting). We also highlight the importance of specific antimicrobial-producing bacteria present only in dark secretions that may be key in this defensive symbiosis. Finally, we discuss the possible role of environmental conditions in shaping the uropygial microbiota, based on differences found between wild and captive hoopoes.

Indexed as

bacteriaclostridiafluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)high-throughput sequencinghoopoemicrobiotamutualismquantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)uropygial gland secretion

Identifiers

PMID30103505
PMCPMC6115775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.