Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103501›Full record

ReviewViruses2018

Going (Reo)Viral: Factors Promoting Successful Reoviral Oncolytic Infection.

Tarryn Bourhill, Yoshinori Mori, Derrick E Rancourt, Maya Shmulevitz, Randal N Johnston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. NgR1 binding to reovirus reveals an unusual bivalent interaction and a new viral attachment protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Reovirus: Friend and Foe.Current clinical microbiology reports · 2019
    Article
  17. Perspectives on immunotherapy via oncolytic viruses.Infectious agents and cancer · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tarryn BourhillDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada. tarryn.bourhill@ucalgary.ca.
Yoshinori MoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Kita-Ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan. ysnmori@yahoo.co.jp.
Derrick E RancourtDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada. rancourt@ucalgary.ca.
Maya ShmulevitzDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada. shmulevi@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8627-068X
Randal N JohnstonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada. rnjohnst@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0599-6877

Funding

CIHR 24009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses show intriguing potential as cancer therapeutic agents. These viruses are capable of selectively targeting and killing cancerous cells while leaving healthy cells largely unaffected. The use of oncolytic viruses for cancer treatments in selected circumstances has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the US and work is progressing on engineering viral vectors for enhanced selectivity, efficacy and safety. However, a better fundamental understanding of tumour and viral biology is essential for the continued advancement of the oncolytic field. This knowledge will not only help to engineer more potent and effective viruses but may also contribute to the identification of biomarkers that can determine which patients will benefit most from this treatment. A mechanistic understanding of the overlapping activity of viral and standard chemotherapeutics will enable the development of better combinational approaches to improve patient outcomes. In this review, we will examine each of the factors that contribute to productive viral infections in cancerous cells versus healthy cells. Special attention will be paid to reovirus as it is a well-studied virus and the only wild-type virus to have received orphan drug designation by the FDA. Although considerable insight into reoviral biology exists, there remain numerous deficiencies in our understanding of the factors regulating its successful oncolytic infection. Here we will discuss what is known to regulate infection as well as speculate about potential new mechanisms that may enhance successful replication. A joint appreciation of both tumour and viral biology will drive innovation for the next generation of reoviral mediated oncolytic therapy.

Indexed as

Oncolytic VirotherapyAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicGenetic VectorsHumansMelanomaMiceNeoplasmsOncolytic VirusesOrphan Drug ProductionReoviridaeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationVirus Replicationoncolysisoncolytic virusreovirussusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID30103501
PMCPMC6116061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.