Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103493›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Repair of Damaged Articular Cartilage: Current Approaches and Future Directions.

Ekaterina V Medvedeva, Ekaterina A Grebenik, Svetlana N Gornostaeva, Vladimir I Telpuhov, Aleksey V Lychagin, Peter S Timashev, Andrei S Chagin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. InjectableACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Photobiomodulation in Promoting Cartilage Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ekaterina V MedvedevaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia. medvedevaekaterina@yandex.ru.
Ekaterina A GrebenikInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia. grebeneka@gmail.com.
Svetlana N GornostaevaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia. svetlana.gornost@gmail.com.
Vladimir I TelpuhovInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia. telpuhov@mail.ru.
Aleksey V LychaginDepartment of Trauma, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia. dr.lychagin@mail.ru.
Peter S TimashevInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia. timashev.peter@gmail.com.
Andrei S ChaginInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia. andrei.chagin@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Articular hyaline cartilage is extensively hydrated, but it is neither innervated nor vascularized, and its low cell density allows only extremely limited self-renewal. Most clinical and research efforts currently focus on the restoration of cartilage damaged in connection with osteoarthritis or trauma. Here, we discuss current clinical approaches for repairing cartilage, as well as research approaches which are currently developing, and those under translation into clinical practice. We also describe potential future directions in this area, including tissue engineering based on scaffolding and/or stem cells as well as a combination of gene and cell therapy. Particular focus is placed on cell-based approaches and the potential of recently characterized chondro-progenitors; progress with induced pluripotent stem cells is also discussed. In this context, we also consider the ability of different types of stem cell to restore hyaline cartilage and the importance of mimicking the environment in vivo during cell expansion and differentiation into mature chondrocytes.

Indexed as

ChondrocytesJoint CapsuleOsteoarthritisWounds and InjuriesAnimalsHumansTissue Engineeringarticular hyaline cartilageautologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI)cell-based therapymatrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI)micro-fracturemosaicplastyregenerative medicine approachesstem cellstissue-engineered constructs

Identifiers

PMID30103493
PMCPMC6122081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.