Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103463›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Circumstances and Structure of Occupational Sharp Injuries among Healthcare Workers of a Selected Hospital in Central Poland.

Anna Garus-Pakowska, Magdalena Ulrichs, Ewelina Gaszyńska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biohazard Accidents, Harmful Elements to the Wellness of Healthcare Workers, and Their Risk Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cost of Blood and Body Fluid Occupational Exposure Management in Beijing, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Factors associated with accidents involving biological material among health professionals.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Garus-PakowskaDepartment of Hygiene and Health Promotion, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland. anna.garus-pakowska@umed.lodz.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-1677-8146
Magdalena UlrichsDepartment of Econometrics, University of Lodz, 90-214 Lodz, Poland. magdalena.ulrichs@uni.lodz.pl.
Ewelina GaszyńskaDepartment of Hygiene and Health Promotion, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland. ewelina.gaszynska@umed.lodz.pl.
Medical University of Lodz · PLUniversity of Łódź · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: An analysis of work-related sharp injuries in Healthcare Workers (HCWs) based at a selected hospital in Central Poland by presenting the frequency of accidents, injury rates, and identifying circumstances of Needle Sticks and Sharp Injuries (NSSI) and giving Post-Exposure Procedures (PEP). (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of medical documentation regarding work-related NSSI at a district hospital located in central Poland; over the period 2010⁻2017. The study group included HCWs who had an accident while on duty. (3) Results: Most injuries were reported by nurses and staff over 40, on the morning shift. The most common injuries were using a needle. The most exposed part of the body were fingers. The average annual injury rates were: 1.22/100 Nurses; 2.02/100 doctors; 1.34/100 hospital beds; and 8.59/100,000 inpatient days. The rates for 3-year periods, after the implementation of legal regulations were higher than before.

conclusionInjuries rates are more reliable for comparison than frequency. Legislation on the need to register injuries seems to be necessary. In the supervision of work safety of personnel, reliable reporting of all injuries by the respective HCWs plays a key role.

Indexed as

Accidents, OccupationalHospitalsHumansMedical Staff, HospitalNeedlestick InjuriesOccupational InjuriesPolandRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSafety Managementhealthcare workersinjury rateslegal regulationsneedlestick/sharp injuriesoccupational exposurespostexposure prophylaxisprevalencereportingsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID30103463
PMCPMC6121680
OpenAlexW2886033831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.