Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103445›Full record

ArticleGenes2018

Sequencing of Supernumerary Chromosomes of Red Fox and Raccoon Dog Confirms a Non-Random Gene Acquisition by B Chromosomes.

Alexey I Makunin, Svetlana A Romanenko, Violetta R Beklemisheva, Polina L Perelman, Anna S Druzhkova, Kristina O Petrova, Dmitry Yu Prokopov, Ekaterina N Chernyaeva, Jennifer L Johnson, Anna V Kukekova and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sequence of the supernumerary B chromosome of maize provides insight into its drive mechanism and evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. B Chromosomes in GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexey I MakuninInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. alex@mcb.nsc.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-9555-5097
Svetlana A RomanenkoInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. rosa@mcb.nsc.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-0951-5209
Violetta R BeklemishevaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. bekl@mcb.nsc.ru.
Polina L PerelmanInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. polina.perelman@gmail.com.
Anna S DruzhkovaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. rada@mcb.nsc.ru.
Kristina O PetrovaNovosibirsk State University, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. petrova@mcb.nsc.ru.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-2171
Dmitry Yu ProkopovInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. dprokopov@mcb.nsc.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-8420-5203
Ekaterina N ChernyaevaTheodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199004 Saint-Petersburg, Russia. echernya@gmail.com.
Jennifer L JohnsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. jjohnso@illinois.edu.
Anna V KukekovaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. avk@illinois.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7027-3715
Fengtang YangWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK. fy1@sanger.ac.uk.
Malcolm A Ferguson-SmithCambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK. maf12@cam.ac.uk.
Alexander S GraphodatskyInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. graf@mcb.nsc.ru.ORCID 0000-0002-8282-1085
Vladimir A TrifonovInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia. vlad@mcb.nsc.ru.ORCID 0000-0003-0454-8359
Novosibirsk State University · RUSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USSt Petersburg University · RUUniversity of Cambridge · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B chromosomes (Bs) represent a variable addition to the main karyotype in some lineages of animals and plants. Bs accumulate through non-Mendelian inheritance and become widespread in populations. Despite the presence of multiple genes, most Bs lack specific phenotypic effects, although their influence on host genome epigenetic status and gene expression are recorded. Previously, using sequencing of isolated Bs of ruminants and rodents, we demonstrated that Bs originate as segmental duplications of specific genomic regions, and subsequently experience pseudogenization and repeat accumulation. Here, we used a similar approach to characterize Bs of the red fox (

Indexed as

genome instabilitykaryotype evolutionsupernumerary chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID30103445
PMCPMC6116037
OpenAlexW2886792117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.