ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018
Ethics and Occupational Health in the Contemporary World of Work.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Potential Scenarios and Hazards in the Work of the Future: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed and Gray Literatures.Annals of work exposures and health · 2020Pooled it
- Current Challenges and Perceived Future Priorities in Occupational Medicine: Perspectives From Occupational Health Professionals.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Ethical Use of Wearable Device Data in Occupational Settings: Perspectives From the Fire Service.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2025Article
- Psychosocial risks and ethical implications of technology: considerations for decent work.Annals of work exposures and health · 2025Article
- Perceptions of occupational physicians in supporting transgender and gender-diverse people (returning) at work - a focus group study:BMJ open · 2025Article
- Scoping Review on Ethical Considerations in Research on the Work-Family Interaction Process.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Ethical challenges from a problem-solving intervention with workplace involvement: a qualitative study among employees with common mental disorders, first-line managers, and rehabilitation coordinators.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024Article
- The internet of things deployed for occupational health and safety purposes: A qualitative study of opportunities and ethical issues.PloS one · 2024Article
- Behind the good of digital tools for occupational safety and health: a scoping review of ethical issues surrounding the use of the internet of things.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Scoping Review of the Occupational Health and Safety Governance in Sudan: The Story So Far.Safety and health at work · 2023Article
- Occupational physicians dealing with mental health: between employee and company interests: a qualitative study.BMC psychology · 2022Article
- Expanding the Focus of Occupational Safety and Health: Lessons from a Series of Linked Scientific Meetings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Health Personnel Improvement in the Implementation of Shariah's Ethical Code of Conduct in Tangerang Hospital, Indonesia.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- Ethics andInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Involving Moral and Ethical Principles in Safety Management Systems.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Oxidative Stress Parameters as Useful Tools in Evaluating the DNA Damage and Changes in the Complete Blood Count in Hospital Workers Exposed to Low Doses of Antineoplastic Drugs and Ionizing Radiation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Vulnerable Workers and COVID-19: Insights from a Survey of Members of the International Commission for Occupational Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Ethical Conflicts Experienced by Nurses in Geriatric Hospitals in South Korea: "If You Can't Stand the Heat, Get Out of the Kitchen".International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Harmonization of Biosafety and Biosecurity Standards for High-Containment Facilities in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Approach From the Perspective of Occupational Safety and Health.Frontiers in public health · 2019Review
- Comment on Iavicoli et al. Ethics and Occupational Health in the Contemporary World of Work. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1713.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last two decades have seen increasing attention to professional ethics in the field of occupational health in industrialized and developing countries, partly reflecting the changing world of work, demographic shifts and new technologies. These changes have led to the revisiting of traditional ethical principles and the emergence of ethical issues related to occupational health. This article looks at the problems raised by these ethical concerns and proposes some solutions. We revised the existing literature on the ethical conflict in occupational health in order to identifying drivers and barriers for correct professional ethics. The ethical choices are not only based on balanced risk and benefit assessment for various stakeholders, but there are a number of deontological aspects as well that go beyond the mere benefit domains. There is still no systematic approach for analysing the true extent of these issues and their solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.