Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30103386›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Assessment Tools for Health Literacy among the General Population: A Systematic Review.

Hongyan Liu, Huan Zeng, Yang Shen, Fan Zhang, Manoj Sharma, Weiyun Lai, Yu Zhao, Genhui Tao, Jun Yuan, Yong Zhao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of instruments to measure health literacy of patients in emergency departments.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of the Swahili Cancer Health Literacy Test for use in the African context.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongyan LiuSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. 15178844252@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6291-9069
Huan ZengSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. zenghuan586@aliyun.com.
Yang ShenSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. cqmusssy1989@163.com.
Fan ZhangSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. 102715@cqmu.edu.cn.
Manoj SharmaBehavioral & Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS 39213, USA. manoj.sharma@jsums.edu.
Weiyun LaiProject Office, Chongqing Health Education Institute, Chongqing 400016, China. m13372713201@163.com.
Yu ZhaoProject Office, Chongqing Health Education Institute, Chongqing 400016, China. zy10550812@163.com.
Genhui TaoProject Office, Chongqing Health Education Institute, Chongqing 400016, China. 18166310077@163.com.
Jun YuanSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. yuanjun@cqmu.edu.cn.
Yong ZhaoSchool of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. zhaoyong@cqmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health literacy is an important determinant of health, and is one of the key indicators of a healthy city. Developing and improving methods to measure health literacy is prudent and necessary. This review summarizes the findings of published tools for assessing health literacy among the general population to provide a reference for establishing health literacy assessment tools in the future. In this systematic review, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were used to search articles regarding tools for assessing health literacy among the general population published up to 10 January 2018. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, quality assessment of methodology, and data extraction according to preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality assessment of the research was examined with the use of the specifications of the reporting guidelines for survey research (SURGE). Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria. All included instruments in monitoring the health literacy of the general population were presented through the form of questionnaires. The multistage process of making all the scales generally involved the following steps: item development, pre-testing, and evaluation of readability. However, the specific methods were different. Internal consistency for all the instruments was acceptable but with weak consistency among the subscales for some instruments. Most of the identified instruments derived from the definition of health literacy or were based on existing health literacy theory. Approximately 30% of the performed studies provided no description of the important features specified in the SURGE. This review indicates a trend in the increasing tools for assessing the health literacy of the general population by using multidimensional structures and comprehensive measurement approaches. However, no clear "consensus" was observed in the dimensions of health literacy tools.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementDatabases, FactualHealth LiteracyHealth Services ResearchHumansQuality Assurance, Health Careassessment toolgeneral populationhealth equalityhealth in all policyhealth literacy

Identifiers

PMID30103386
PMCPMC6122038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.