Neural stem cell spacing questions their self-renewal.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Tissue Engineering and Biomaterial Strategies to Elicit Endogenous Neuronal Replacement in the Brain.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
   Review
2. Modes of division and differentiation of neural stem cells.Behavioural brain research · 2019
   Review
3. Cell Kinetics in the Adult Neurogenic Niche and Impact of Diet-Induced Accelerated Aging.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
   Article
4. Radiation Induces Distinct Changes in Defined Subpopulations of Neural Stem and Progenitor Cells in the Adult Hippocampus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as