Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102934›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology2018

ERP indices of performance monitoring and feedback processing in psychosis: A meta-analysis.

Elizabeth A Martin, Amanda McCleery, Melody M Moore, Jonathan K Wynn, Michael F Green, William P Horan

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Auditory event-related potentials and psychosis dimensions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Activation of Internal Correctness Monitoring Circuitry in Youths With Psychosis Spectrum Symptoms.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neurocognitive efficiency in breast cancer survivorship: A performance monitoring ERP study.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A MartinDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, United States of America. Electronic address: emartin8@uci.edu.
Amanda McCleeryVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
Melody M MooreDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, United States of America.
Jonathan K WynnVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
Michael F GreenVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
William P HoranVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
Neurobehavioral Systems · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

Cortical Plasticity Across Phase of Illness in SchizophreniaK23MH108829 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MCCLEERY, AMANDA · 2016 to 2022
$910k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH108829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough individuals with, or at risk for, psychotic disorders often show difficulties with performance monitoring and feedback processing, findings from studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) to index these processes are not consistent. This meta-analytic review focused on studies of two different indexes of performance monitoring, the early error-related negativity (ERN; n = 25) and the later error positivity (Pe; n = 17), and one index of feedback processing, the feedback negativity (FN; n = 6).

methodsWe evaluated whether individuals (1) with psychotic disorders, or (2) at heightened risk for these disorders differ from healthy controls in available studies of the ERN, Pe, and FN.

resultsThere was a significant, large ERN reduction in those with psychosis (g = -0.96) compared to controls, and a significant, moderate ERN reduction in those at-risk (g = -0.48). In contrast, there were uniformly non-significant, small between-group differences for Pe and FN (gs ≤ |0.16|).

conclusionsThe results reveal a differential pattern of impairment in psychosis. Early performance monitoring (ERN) impairments are substantial among those with psychotic disorders in general and may be a useful vulnerability indicator for these disorders. However, later performance monitoring (Pe) and basic feedback processing (FN) appear to be relatively spared in psychosis.

Indexed as

Affective Disorders, PsychoticCerebral CortexEvoked PotentialsExecutive FunctionFeedback, PsychologicalHumansPsychomotor PerformancePsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaERNError positivityError-related negativityFeedback-related negativityFNPe

Identifiers

PMID30102934
PMCPMC6157731
OpenAlexW2885941492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.