Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102734›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

First report of Anaplasma marginale infection in goats, Brazil.

Nayara B da Silva, Naomi S Taus, Wendell C Johnson, Anabela Mira, Leonhard Schnittger, Jessica D M Valente, Odilon Vidotto, Hayley E Masterson, Thállitha S W J Vieira, Massaro W Ueti and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Feeding ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  4. Unravelling the diversity ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nayara B da SilvaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Naomi S TausAnimal Diseases Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Wendell C JohnsonAnimal Diseases Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Anabela MiraInstitute of Pathobiology, Center of Research in Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, INTA-Castelar, Argentina.
Leonhard SchnittgerInstitute of Pathobiology, Center of Research in Veterinary and Agronomic Sciences, INTA-Castelar, Argentina.
Jessica D M ValenteDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Odilon VidottoDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Hayley E MastersonDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Thállitha S W J VieiraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8631-2712
Massaro W UetiAnimal Diseases Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Rafael F C VieiraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6613-0287
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRAgricultural Research Service · USUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplasma marginale, the causative agent of bovine anaplasmosis, is a tick-borne bacterium that causes significant economic losses for cattle industries and is increasingly being detected in other animal species. Rhipicephalus microplus is the main vector of this bacterium and may be found parasitizing small ruminants. In northeastern Brazil, multispecies grazing is a common family subsistence practice on smallholder farms possibly facilitating interspecies transmission of pathogens. Considering that A. marginale infection has been previously molecularly described in sheep, this study has aimed to estimate the prevalence of A. marginale and factors associated with the infection in goats from northeastern Brazil. A total of 403 goat blood samples were included in the study. An epidemiological questionnaire was applied to each farm owner addressing age, gender, presence of ticks and multispecies grazing. All samples were screened for A. marginale- and A. ovis-infection using primers targeting the Anaplasma spp. msp4 gene. The identity of A. marginale in the blood was confirmed by PCR amplification of msp5 followed by sequencing. Anaplasma spp. were differentiated by sequencing of the repeat region of the msp1α gene. For the statistical analysis the Chi-square or the Fisher's exact test was used to verify association of the individual factors (age, gender, presence of ticks, and multispecies grazing) with Anaplasma spp. infection. We report the first molecular detection of A. marginale in goats from northeastern Brazil, based on msp1α, msp4 and msp5 gene sequencing analysis. Sequencing of the detected A. marginale msp1α gene revealed the F repeat. Amblyomma parvum and R. microplus were found feeding on animals.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnaplasma marginaleAnaplasmosisAnimalsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBrazilFemaleGoatsMaleSheepSheep DiseasesBacterial Outer Membrane Proteinsmajor surface protein 1a, Anaplasma

Identifiers

PMID30102734
PMCPMC6089441
OpenAlexW2885226860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.