Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102659›Full record

ReviewAIDS (London, England)2018

p24 revisited: a landscape review of antigen detection for early HIV diagnosis.

Eleanor R Gray, Robert Bain, Olivia Varsaneux, Rosanna W Peeling, Molly M Stevens, Rachel A McKendry

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analytical and Clinical Performance of VIDASDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Different approaches to HIV confirmation: a survey of three Italian regions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. HIV Virion Capturing Liposomes for Therapeutic Vaccination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Isolation of Peptide Ligands for the HIV Capsid Protein p24 by Phage-Display.International journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleanor R GrayLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences, University College London.
Robert BainDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London.
Olivia VarsaneuxLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Rosanna W PeelingLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Molly M StevensDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London.
Rachel A McKendryLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences, University College London.
Imperial College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBLondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P024378/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: Despite major advances in HIV testing, early detection of infection at the point of care (PoC) remains a key challenge. Although rapid antibody PoC and laboratory-based nucleic acid amplification tests dominate the diagnostics market, the viral capsid protein p24 is recognized as an alternative early virological biomarker of infection. However, the detection of ultra-low levels of p24 at the PoC has proven challenging. Here we review the landscape of p24 diagnostics to identify knowledge gaps and barriers and help shape future research agendas. Five hundred and seventy-four research articles to May 2018 that propose or evaluate diagnostic assays for p24 were identified and reviewed. We give a brief history of diagnostic development, and the utility of p24 as a biomarker in different populations such as infants, the newly infected, those on preexposure prophylaxis and self-testers. We review the performance of commercial p24 assays and consider elements such as immune complex disruption, resource-poor settings, prevalence, and assay antibodies. Emerging and ultrasensitive assays are reviewed and show a number of promising approaches but further translation has been limited. We summarize studies on the health economic benefits of using antigen testing. Finally, we speculate on the future uses of high-performance p24 assays, particularly, if available in self-test format.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineHIV Core Protein p24HIV InfectionsPoint-of-Care TestingEarly DiagnosisHumansHIV Core Protein p24

Identifiers

PMID30102659
PMCPMC6139023
OpenAlexW2887675466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.