Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102621›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in supportive and palliative care2018

Understanding sex differences in the regulation of cancer-induced muscle wasting.

Ryan N Montalvo, Brittany R Counts, James A Carson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in supportive and palliative care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hallmarks of Cancer Cachexia: Sexual Dimorphism in Related Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Cancer Cachexia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Emerging markers of cancer cachexia and their relationship to sarcopenia.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan N MontalvoDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Public Health Research Center, Columbia, USA.
Brittany R Counts
James A Carson
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Cachexia in ApcMin/+ mice: The role of IL-6R01CA121249 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI CARSON, JAMES A · 2008 to 2018
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe highlight evidence for sexual dimorphism in preclinical and clinical studies investigating the cause and treatment of cancer cachexia. RECENT

findingsCancer cachexia is unintended bodyweight loss occurring with cancer, and skeletal muscle wasting is a critical predictor of negative outcomes in the cancer patient. Skeletal muscle exhibits sexual dimorphism in fiber type, function, and regeneration capacity. Sex differences have been implicated in skeletal muscle metabolism, mitochondrial function, immune response to injury, and myogenic stem cell regulation. All of these processes have the potential to be involved in cancer-induced muscle wasting. Unfortunately, the vast majority of published studies examining cancer cachexia in preclinical models or cancer patients either have not accounted for sex in their design or have exclusively studied males. Preclinical studies have established that ovarian function and estradiol can affect skeletal muscle function, metabolism and mass; ovarian function has also been implicated in the sensitivity of circulating inflammatory cytokines and the progression of cachexia. SUMMARY: Females and males have unique characteristics that effect skeletal muscle's microenvironment and intrinsic signaling. These differences provide a strong rationale for distinct causes for cancer cachexia development and treatment in males and females.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAgingAnimalsCachexiaEstrogensHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMitochondriaMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalNeoplasmsOxidation-ReductionResistance TrainingSignal TransductionEstrogensMuscle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30102621
PMCPMC6239206
OpenAlexW2886962433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.