Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102558›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2019

Review of risk factors of secondary cancers among cancer survivors.

Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt, Florent de Vathaire

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of vector copy number on critical quality attributes of retrovirally engineered T cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Surviving childhood cancer: the hidden threat of second malignancies.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Impact of Population Cancer Risk on the Cost-effectiveness of Multicancer Early Detection Testing in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte Demoor-GoldschmidtCESP University, Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Florent de VathaireCESP University, Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in cancer survival have made the long-term risks from treatments more important, in particular among the children, adolescents and young adults who are more at risk particularly due to a longer life expectancy and a higher sensitivity to treatments. Subsequent malignancies in cancer survivors now constitute 15 to 20% of all cancer diagnoses in the cancer registries. Lots of studies are published to determine risk factors, with some controversial findings. Just data from large cohorts with detailed information on individual treatments and verification of what is called "secondary cancers" can add some knowledge, because their main difficulty is that the number of events for most second cancer sites are low, which impact the statistical results. In this review of the literature, we distinguish second and secondary cancers and discuss the factors contributing to this increased risk of secondary cancers. The article concludes with a summary of current surveillance and screening recommendations.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicNeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryRegistriesRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30102558
PMCPMC6435077
OpenAlexW2885656545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.