Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102446›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2019

Inhibition of Experimental Tinnitus With High Frequency Stimulation of the Rat Medial Geniculate Body.

Gusta van Zwieten, Marcus L F Janssen, Jasper V Smit, A Miranda L Janssen, Milaine Roet, Ali Jahanshahi, Robert J Stokroos, Yasin Temel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep brain stimulation of the medial geniculate body for refractory tinnitus: A feasibility study.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Animal Models of Tinnitus Treatment: Cochlear and Brain Stimulation.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gusta van ZwietenDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat/Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marcus L F JanssenDepartment of Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0030-7224
Jasper V SmitDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat/Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A Miranda L JanssenDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat/Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Milaine RoetDepartment of Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ali JahanshahiDepartment of Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Robert J StokroosDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat/Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Yasin TemelDepartment of Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Dutch Heinsius-Houbolt Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuromodulation is a promising treatment modality for tinnitus, especially in chronic and severe cases. The auditory thalamus plays a key role in the pathophysiology of tinnitus, as it integrates and processes auditory and limbic information.

objectiveThe effect of high frequency stimulation and low frequency stimulation of the medial geniculate bodies on tinnitus in a noise-induced tinnitus rat model is assessed. MATERIALS AND

methodsPresence of tinnitus was verified using the gap-induced prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response paradigm. Hearing thresholds were determined before and after noise trauma with auditory brainstem responses. Anxiety-related side-effects were evaluated in the elevated zero maze and open field.

resultsResults show tinnitus development after noise exposure and preserved hearing thresholds of the ear that was protected from noise trauma. We found that high frequency stimulation of the medial geniculate bodies suppressed tinnitus. This effect maintained directly after stimulation when the stimulator was turned off. Low frequency stimulation did not have any effects on the gap:no-gap ratio of the acoustic startle response.

conclusionHigh frequency stimulation of the MGB has a direct and residual suppressing effect on tinnitus in this animal model. Low frequency stimulation of the MGB did not inhibit tinnitus.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsDeep Brain StimulationEvoked Potentials, AuditoryEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemGeniculate BodiesMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTinnitusDeep brain stimulationmedial geniculate bodyneuromodulationpreclinicaltinnitus

Identifiers

PMID30102446
PMCPMC6618158
OpenAlexW2887232279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.