Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102415›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2018

Alcohol Outlets, Neighborhood Retail Environments, and Pedestrian Injury Risk.

Elizabeth D Nesoff, Adam J Milam, Charles C Branas, Silvia S Martins, Amy R Knowlton, Debra M Furr-Holden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth D NesoffDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Adam J MilamDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Charles C BranasDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Silvia S MartinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Amy R KnowltonDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Debra M Furr-HoldenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint, Michigan.

Funding

Substance Abuse Epidemiology Training Program (SAETP) at Columbia UniversityT32DA031099 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBORAH S HASIN, Silvia Saboia Martins · 2012 to 2026
$6.1M
A randomized trial of abandoned housing remediation, substance abuse and violenceR01AA024941 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRANAS, CHARLES C., MACDONALD, JOHN M · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Enhanced brief Intervention for linking opiate abusing EMS patients to treatmentR34DA034314 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KNOWLTON, AMY · 2012 to 2013
$680k
Alcohol and Pedestrian Injury: Inquiry into Built and Social Environment FactorsF31AA023716 · NIAAA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NESOFF, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2016
$85k
NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE003094NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA023716NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024941NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA034314NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlcohol outlet density has been associated with increased pedestrian injury risk. It is unclear whether this is because alcohol outlets are located in dense retail areas with heavy pedestrian traffic or whether alcohol outlets contribute a unique neighborhood risk. We aimed to compare the pedestrian injury rate around alcohol outlets to the rate around other, similar retail outlets that do not sell alcohol.

methodsA spatial analysis was conducted on census block groups in Baltimore City. Data included pedestrian injury emergency medical services (EMS) records from January 1, 2014 to April 15, 2015 (n = 848); locations of alcohol outlets licensed for off-premise (n = 726) and on-premise consumption (n = 531); and corner (n = 398) and convenience stores (n = 192) that do not sell alcohol. Negative binomial regression was used to determine the relationship between retail outlet count and pedestrian injuries, controlling for key confounding variables. Spatial autocorrelation was also assessed and variable selection adjusted accordingly.

resultsEach additional off-premise alcohol outlet was associated with a 12.3% increase in the rate of neighborhood pedestrian injury when controlling for convenience and corner stores and other confounders (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.123, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.065, 1.184, p < 0.001). The attributable risk was 4.9% (95% CI = 0.3, 8.9) or 41 additional injuries. On-premise alcohol outlets were not significant predictors of neighborhood pedestrian injury rate in multivariable models (IRR = 0.972, 95% CI = 0.940, 1.004, p = 0.194).

conclusionsOff-premise alcohol outlets are associated with pedestrian injury rate, even when controlling for other types of retail outlets. Findings reinforce the importance of alcohol outlets in understanding neighborhood pedestrian injury risk and may provide evidence for informing policy on liquor store licensing, zoning, and enforcement.

Indexed as

PedestriansResidence CharacteristicsAccidents, TrafficAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesBaltimoreCommerceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsAlcohol AvailabilityAlcohol OutletsNeighborhoodPedestrian InjurySpatial Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30102415
PMCPMC6167150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.