Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102360›Full record

ArticleInternational health2019

Elimination through collaboration: success factors in a global consortium.

Sarah Bartlett, Dominic Haslam, Simon Bush, Danny Haddad

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Primary health care and sustainable development goals.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah BartlettSightsavers, 2803 Saint Philip Street, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Dominic HaslamSightsavers, 35 Perrymount Road, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, UK.
Simon BushSightsavers, Densu Point, 3 Wawa Avenue, Accra, Ghana.
Danny HaddadOrbis International, 520 8th Avenue #12, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Global Trachoma Mapping Project (GTMP) is the largest infectious disease survey ever undertaken. With 60 partners, 2.6 million people were examined across 29 countries for the blinding neglected tropical disease (NTD) trachoma, establishing the prevalence of the disease globally. Such an achievement was only made possible by building a diverse worldwide consortium. This article examines that public-private consortium and attempts to highlight key factors in the success of its development and operation. Two critical factors in the project's success were the establishment of an evidence-based common approach and urgency around a shared goal. The common approach (the GTMP methodologies, tools and training approach) and the goal (GET2020 through the SAFE strategy) are thoroughly detailed in this article. Transparency at all levels; clear roles for committees, partners, agencies and ministries of health and shared funding played important roles and are explored here. It is hoped that by examining and sharing the positive factors leading to the establishment and work of this specific consortium, other similar initiatives-for NTDs, for health more broadly and for other development areas-will be able to adopt such an approach for effective collaboration.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDisease EradicationGlobal HealthHumansNeglected DiseasesPrevalenceProgram EvaluationTrachomaTropical Medicine

Identifiers

PMID30102360
PMCPMC6314149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.