ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
On entropy and information in gene interaction networks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decreasing Intracellular Entropy by Increasing Mitochondrial Efficiency and Reducing ROS Formation-The Effect on the Ageing Process and Age-Related Damage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Detecting tipping points of complex diseases by network information entropy.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of tissue-specific genes in maize based on machine learning models: CNN performs technically best, LightGBM performs biologically soundest.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- RSNET: inferring gene regulatory networks by a redundancy silencing and network enhancement technique.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A novel essential protein identification method based on PPI networks and gene expression data.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- A novel estimator of the interaction matrix in Graphical Gaussian Model of omics data using the entropy of non-equilibrium systems.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- The Inhibitory Effects of Recombinant Hespintor Combined with Sorafenib on Transplanted Human Hepatoma in Nude Mice, and Transcriptional Regulation of Hespintor Based on RNA-Seq.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- An in vivo genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies the RNA-binding protein Staufen2 as a key regulator of myeloid leukemia.Nature cancer · 2020Article
- Network Patterns of Herbal Combinations in Traditional Chinese Clinical Prescriptions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationModern biological experiments often produce candidate lists of genes presumably related to the studied phenotype. One can ask if the gene list as a whole makes sense in the context of existing knowledge: Are the genes in the list reasonably related to each other or do they look like a random assembly? There are also situations when one wants to know if two or more gene sets are closely related. Gene enrichment tests based on counting the number of genes two sets have in common are adequate if we presume that two genes are related only when they are in fact identical. If by related we mean well connected in the interaction network space, we need a new measure of relatedness for gene sets.
resultsWe derive entropy, interaction information and mutual information for gene sets on interaction networks, starting from a simple phenomenological model of a living cell. Formally, the model describes a set of interacting linear harmonic oscillators in thermal equilibrium. Because the energy function is a quadratic form of the degrees of freedom, entropy and all other derived information quantities can be calculated exactly. We apply these concepts to estimate the probability that genes from several independent genome-wide association studies are not mutually informative; to estimate the probability that two disjoint canonical metabolic pathways are not mutually informative; and to infer relationships among human diseases based on their gene signatures. We show that the present approach is able to predict observationally validated relationships not detectable by gene enrichment methods. The converse is also true; the two methods are therefore complementary. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The functions defined in this paper are available in an R package, gsia, available for download at https://github.com/ucsd-ccbb/gsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.