Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102151›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Cerebellar involvement in an evidence-accumulation decision-making task.

Ben Deverett, Sue Ann Koay, Marlies Oostland, Samuel S-H Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recurrent Neural Circuits Overcome Partial Inactivation by Compensation and Re-learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ben DeverettDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-7649
Sue Ann KoayPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.
Marlies OostlandPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9474-4040
Samuel S-H WangDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-9786

Funding

Subcortical Neural Coding and DynamicsU19NS104648 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Imaging adaptive cerebellar processing at cellular resolution in awake miceR01NS045193 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SAMUEL SHENG-HUNG · 2003 to 2024
$7.5M
Cerebellar determinants of flexible and social behavior on rapid time scales in autism model mice.R01MH115750 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM, SHAEVITZ, JOSHUA W · 2017 to 2021
$4.7M
Mechanisms of neural circuit dynamics in working memoryU01NS090541 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BIALEK, WILLIAM, BRODY, CARLOS D · 2014 to 2016
$3.1M
Cerebellar contributions to reward prediction and decision-makingF30MH115577 · NIMH · RBHS-ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DEVERETT, BEN · 2017 to 2020
$191k
NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH115577NIMH NIH HHS MH115577NIMH NIH HHS MH115750NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115750NINDS NIH HHS NS045193NINDS NIH HHS NS090541NINDS NIH HHS NS104648NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045193NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090541NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To make successful evidence-based decisions, the brain must rapidly and accurately transform sensory inputs into specific goal-directed behaviors. Most experimental work on this subject has focused on forebrain mechanisms. Using a novel evidence-accumulation task for mice, we performed recording and perturbation studies of crus I of the lateral posterior cerebellum, which communicates bidirectionally with numerous forebrain regions. Cerebellar inactivation led to a reduction in the fraction of correct trials. Using two-photon fluorescence imaging of calcium, we found that Purkinje cell somatic activity contained choice/evidence-related information. Decision errors were represented by dendritic calcium spikes, which in other contexts are known to drive cerebellar plasticity. We propose that cerebellar circuitry may contribute to computations that support accurate performance in this perceptual decision-making task.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPerceptionAction PotentialsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCalcium SignalingCerebellumFemaleMaleMiceNeuronscerebellumdecision-makingevidence accumulationmouseneuroscienceworking memory

Identifiers

PMID30102151
PMCPMC6105309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.