Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30102062›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2018

Differences in puff topography, toxicant exposure, and subjective response between waterpipe tobacco smoking men and women.

Eric K Soule, Carolina Ramôa, Thomas Eissenberg, Caroline O Cobb

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nicotine and Toxicant Exposure Among Concurrent Users (Co-Users) of Tobacco and Cannabis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric K SouleDepartment of Psychology.
Carolina RamôaDepartment of Psychology.
Thomas EissenbergDepartment of Psychology.
Caroline O CobbDepartment of Psychology.

Funding

Training and Education Core p270-287P50DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI EISSENBERG, THOMAS EVAN · 2013 to 2017
$19.2M
Waterpipe tobacco smoke: toxicant exposure and effectsR01CA120142 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI EISSENBERG, THOMAS EVAN · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
Evaluating the acute effects of caffeinated waterpipe tobaccoF31DA028102 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI COBB, CAROLINE O · 2010 to 2011
$62k
Food and Drug Administration; Center for Tobacco ProductsNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health; National Institute on Drug AbuseNCI NIH HHS R01 CA120142NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA028102NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) exposes users to toxicants in much greater amounts than a cigarette. Little is known about how gender affects WTS toxicant exposure and subjective response. Data from three WTS clinical laboratory studies were combined for analysis. Participants (

Indexed as

Carbon MonoxideInhalation ExposureNicotineSmokersWater Pipe SmokingAdultBreath TestsDiagnostic Self EvaluationFemaleHazardous SubstancesHumansMaleResearch DesignSex FactorsTobacco SmokingCarbon MonoxideHazardous SubstancesNicotine

Identifiers

PMID30102062
PMCPMC6162145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.