Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101989›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2019

What is palliative care? Perceptions of healthcare professionals.

Birgitta Wallerstedt, Eva Benzein, Kristina Schildmeijer, Anna Sandgren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. TheHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Birgitta WallerstedtDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1487-4713
Eva BenzeinDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden.
Kristina SchildmeijerDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden.
Anna SandgrenDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Sweden.
Linnaeus University · SE

Funding

Kamprad Family Foundation for Entrepreneurship, Research & Charity
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increased attention and knowledge in palliative care, there is still confusion concerning how to interpret the concept of palliative care and implement it in practice. This can result in difficulties for healthcare professionals in identifying patients whom would benefit from palliative care, which, in turn, could lead to a delay in meeting patients' needs.

aimTo explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of palliative care.

methodData were collected through twelve interprofessional focus group interviews in community care and hospital wards in south Sweden (n = 74). All interviews were analysed with latent content analysis.

resultsThree domains were revealed: first, a blurred conceptual understanding as participants described palliative care using synonyms, diagnoses, phases, natural care and holism; second, a challenge to communicate transitions concerned the importance of how and when the transition to palliative care was communicated and documented; finally, a need for interprofessional collaboration was described as well as the consequences for severely ill persons, relatives and healthcare professionals when it was not established.

conclusionThe perceptions about how to interpret palliative care differed as well as when palliative care should be offered and decided, which might have practical consequences. How long a person has left to live is of great significance for decision-making, caregiving and preparation in palliative care. The challenge is to use interprofessional communication to promote understanding and collaborate across varied care levels. Integrating palliative care across diverse care levels could be one way to reduce the ambiguity of palliative care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareQualitative ResearchSwedencollaborationcommunicationconceptual definitionfocus group interviewshealthcare professionalspalliative careperceptions

Identifiers

PMID30101989
PMCPMC7432164
OpenAlexW2887984626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.