Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101924›Full record

ReviewInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2018

Diabetic Nephropathy: A Comparison of the Clinical and Pathological Features between the CKD Risk Classification and the Classification of Diabetic Nephropathy 2014 in Japan.

Kengo Furuichi, Miho Shimizu, Akinori Hara, Tadashi Toyama, Takashi Wada

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kengo FuruichiDivision of Nephrology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan.
Miho ShimizuDivision of Nephrology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan.
Akinori HaraDivision of Nephrology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan.
Tadashi ToyamaDivision of Nephrology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan.
Takashi WadaDivision of Nephrology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan.
Kanazawa University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic kidney disease is the main cause of end-stage kidney disease. However, the clinical manifestations of diabetic kidney disease are diverse. Therefore, the clinical classification of diabetic kidney disease is clinically important and valuable. In Japan, two clinical staging systems divided by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria can be used for diabetic kidney disease: the chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk classification and the Japanese classification of diabetic nephropathy. The Japanese classification of diabetic nephropathy and the CKD risk classification are similar; however, these two classification systems show different frequencies of outcomes. For example, the frequency of the kidney outcomes in stage 4 of the Japanese classification of diabetic nephropathy was found to be higher than that in the red stage of the CKD risk classification (composite kidney events: stage 4=32.0/100 person-years, red =14.5/100 person-years). However, there were no marked differences in the speed or rate of decline in the kidney function (speed: stage 4=6.8 mL/min/1.73 m

Indexed as

AlbuminuriaDiabetic NephropathiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansJapanRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk Assessmentbiomarkerbiopsychronic kidney diseasediabetic nephropathyJapanese classification of diabetic nephropathy

Identifiers

PMID30101924
PMCPMC6306527
OpenAlexW2886408236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.