Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101829›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2018

Comparison of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling methods for vitrification of porcine in vitro-produced zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents.

Van Khanh Nguyen, Huong Thi Thu Vu, Huong Thi Nguyen, Huu Xuan Quan, Lan Doan Pham, Kazuhiro Kikuchi, Son Thanh Nguyen, Tamas Somfai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Van Khanh NguyenKey Lab of Animal Cell Biotechnology, National Institute of Animal Science, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Huong Thi Thu VuKey Lab of Animal Cell Biotechnology, National Institute of Animal Science, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Huong Thi NguyenKey Lab of Animal Cell Biotechnology, National Institute of Animal Science, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Huu Xuan QuanKey Lab of Animal Cell Biotechnology, National Institute of Animal Science, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Lan Doan PhamKey Lab of Animal Cell Biotechnology, National Institute of Animal Science, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Kazuhiro KikuchiDivision of Animal Sciences, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Ibaraki 305-8602, Japan.
Son Thanh NguyenKey Lab of Animal Cell Biotechnology, National Institute of Animal Science, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tamas SomfaiAnimal Breeding and Reproduction Research Division, Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, NARO, Ibaraki 305-0901, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the efficacy of the microdrop and minimum volume cooling (MVC) methods for the vitrification of in vitro-produced porcine zygotes and blastocysts after equilibration in low concentrations of cryoprotectant agents. Zygotes and blastocysts were equilibrated in 2% (v/v) ethylene glycol and 2% (v/v) propylene glycol for 13-15 min. Then, they were vitrified in a medium comprised of 17.5% ethylene glycol, 17.5% propylene glycol, 0.3 M sucrose, and 50 mg/ml polyvinylpyrrolidone either by either dropping them directly into liquid nitrogen (microdrop method) or placing them on Cryotop sheets in a minimum volume of medium and plunging into liquid nitrogen (MVC method). Both zygotes and blastocysts were successfully vitrified. For the vitrification of zygotes, the MVC and microdrop methods were equally effective; however, for blastocyst vitrification, MVC was superior. For both methods, the vitrification of zygotes produced higher-quality embryos than the vitrification of blastocysts.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCold TemperatureCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideEmbryo Culture TechniquesEthylene GlycolFemaleMaleOocytesPropylene GlycolSpermatozoaSwineVitrificationZygoteCryoprotective AgentsDimethyl SulfoxideEthylene GlycolPropylene GlycolBlastocystIn vitro embryo productionPorcineVitrificationZygote

Identifiers

PMID30101829
PMCPMC6189571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.