Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101610›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2018

Investigating the Association Between Diabetes Distress and Self-Management Behaviors.

Aneesah Khan, Pratik Choudhary

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348499 (Mixed Methods Study Exploring the Impact of Hybrid Closed-loop Systems on Patient Reported Outcomes in People With Type I Diabetes and Their Partners), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05348499 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Mixed Methods Study Exploring the Impact of Hybrid Closed-loop Systems on Patient Reported Outcomes in People With Type I Diabetes and Their Partners

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LeicesterRan2021 to 2023Enrolled350ConditionsType 1 Diabetes, Insulin Pump Therapy, Patient Reported OutcomesArmsQuestionnaire/Interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Instituting a Successful Discharge Plan for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Challenges and Solutions.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aneesah Khan1 Department of Diabetes, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Pratik Choudhary1 Department of Diabetes, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes distress has been linked with suboptimal glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. We evaluated the effect of diabetes distress on self-management behaviors in patients using insulin pumps.

methodsWe analyzed the impact of diabetes distress on self-management behaviors using pump downloads from 129 adults treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) at a single hospital clinic. Exclusion criteria were CSII treatment <6 months, pregnancy, hemoglobinopathy, and continuous glucose monitoring/sensor use. People were categorized into three groups based on the Diabetes Distress Scale-2 (DDS-2) score: < 2.5, 2.5-3.9, > 4.

resultsParticipants had a mean age of 45.2 ± 19.0 years; duration of diabetes 26.6 ± 16.2 years; duration of CSII 6.0 ± 3.5 years; HbA1c 8.0 ± 1.2%; and DDS-2 score 2.7 ± 1.3. Self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) frequency and bolus wizard usage was similar between groups. Patients with higher distress had higher HbA1c (7.7 ± 0.9 vs. 8.0 ± 0.9 vs. 8.7 ± 1.8; P = 0.004), lower frequency of set changes (4.7 ± 1.3vs. 4.8 ± 1.9 vs. 3.8 ± 1.1; P = .025), a greater number of appointments booked (5.8 ± 4.4 vs. 8.6 ± 4.8 vs. 8.1 ± 6.9; P = .021), and a greater number of appointments missed (1.9 ± 1.3 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5 vs. 3.8 ± 4.1; P = .004).

conclusionsAlthough in some patients, high distress may be caused by reduced self-management, in our highly trained, pump-using patients, high distress was associated with suboptimal biomedical outcomes despite appropriate self-management behaviors. Future work should further explore the relationships between diabetes distress, self-management, and glycemic control.

Indexed as

Self-ManagementAdultAgedBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHealth BehaviorHumansInfusions, SubcutaneousInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsMaleMiddle AgedSelf CareBlood GlucoseInsulincontinuous subcutaneous insulin infusiondistresspumpself-managementself-monitoring blood glucosetype 1

Identifiers

PMID30101610
PMCPMC6232726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.