Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101413›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2018

Three-dimensional printing with nano-enabled filaments releases polymer particles containing carbon nanotubes into air.

Aleksandr B Stefaniak, Lauren N Bowers, Alycia K Knepp, M Abbas Virji, Eileen M Birch, Jason E Ham, J R Wells, Chaolong Qi, Diane Schwegler-Berry, Sherri Friend and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Parameters Influencing the Emission of Ultrafine Particles during 3D Printing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.Re/views in environmental science and bio/technology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandr B StefaniakNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-1460
Lauren N BowersNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Alycia K KneppNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
M Abbas VirjiNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Eileen M BirchNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Jason E HamNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
J R WellsNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Chaolong QiNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Diane Schwegler-BerryNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Sherri FriendNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Alyson R JohnsonNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Stephen B MartinNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Yong QianNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Ryan F LeBoufNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Quinn BirchDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Duane HammondNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM™) 3-dimensional printing uses polymer filament to build objects. Some polymer filaments are formulated with additives, though it is unknown if they are released during printing. Three commercially available filaments that contained carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were printed with a desktop FDM™ 3-D printer in a chamber while monitoring total particle number concentration and size distribution. Airborne particles were collected on filters and analyzed using electron microscopy. Carbonyl compounds were identified by mass spectrometry. The elemental carbon content of the bulk CNT-containing filaments was 1.5 to 5.2 wt%. CNT-containing filaments released up to 10

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalNanotubes, CarbonEnvironmental MonitoringInhalation ExposureParticulate MatterPolymersNanotubes, CarbonParticulate MatterPolymers3-D printingcarbon nanotubeselemental carbonemission ratelung deposition modelingpolymer

Identifiers

PMID30101413
PMCPMC6398333
OpenAlexW2887829571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.