Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101376›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2018

Prophylactic selective arterial embolization for renal angiomyolipomas: efficacy and evaluation of predictive factors of significant shrinkage.

Letao Lin, Chengen Wang, Renguang Pei, Haitao Guan, Jian Wang, Min Yang, Xiaoqiang Tong, Yinghua Zou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Letao LinDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Chengen WangDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Renguang PeiDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Haitao GuanDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Jian WangDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Min YangDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqiang TongDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China.
Yinghua ZouDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing, 100034, People's Republic of China. yinghzou@139.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7538-5924
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic selective arterial embolization (SAE) of angiomyolipomas (AMLs) and to find out predictive factors of significant shrinkage of AMLs after SAE.

methodsPatients receiving prophylactic SAE for renal AMLs with complete medical records were included. The changes of the size, urine erythrocyte counts, and serum creatinine of all patients pre- and post-embolization were assessed. Demographic data, symptoms, the background of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), aneurysms, enhancement features, initial tumor sizes, and serum creatinine pre-embolization were estimated as predictive factors of significant shrinkage in size.

resultsForty-five patients receiving prophylactic SAE for AMLs successfully in our center were included with median follow-up of 14.0 months (interquartile range 6.5-40.5). Mean size of AMLs decreased from 10.7 ± 6.2 to 8.3 ± 5.9 cm by 23.4% ± 20.6% at the latest follow-up (P < 0.001). Urine erythrocytes decreased significantly after SAE (11.1 [interquartile range 5.7-23.2] vs. 6.4 [interquartile range 2.7-13.4], P < 0.001). In addition, there was no significant change between the serum creatinine before and after embolization (81.8 ± 14.9 mmol/L vs. 83.6 ± 17.1 mmol/L, P = 0.224). Of the variables mentioned above, only the enhanced area of AMLs before SAE was statistically significant between the groups with and without significant shrinkage (P < 0.001). In multiv-ariate analysis, enhanced area < 25% (AOR = 0.015, 95% CI 0.001-0.367) and having the background of TSC (AOR = 0.056, 95% CI 0.004-0.799) were identified as predictive factors of significant shrinkage of the tumors.

conclusionsProphylactic SAE is effective in reducing the size of renal AMLs and decreasing urine erythrocytes with preservation of renal function. Significant shrinkage of AMLs after SAE is modulated by the enhanced area and the background of TSC.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticAdultAngiomyolipomaArteriesCreatinineErythrocyte CountFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTuberous SclerosisTumor BurdenCreatinineAngiomyolipomaKidney neoplasmsSelective arterial embolizationTuberous sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID30101376
OpenAlexW2887326120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.