Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101322›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2018

The chromosome-level genome assemblies of two rattans (Calamus simplicifolius and Daemonorops jenkinsiana).

Hansheng Zhao, Songbo Wang, Jiongliang Wang, Chunhai Chen, Shijie Hao, Lianfu Chen, Benhua Fei, Kai Han, Rongsheng Li, Chengcheng Shi and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hansheng ZhaoState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Songbo WangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Building No. 7, BGI Park, No. 21 Hongan 3rd Street, Yantian District, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Jiongliang WangState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Chunhai ChenBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Building No. 7, BGI Park, No. 21 Hongan 3rd Street, Yantian District, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Shijie HaoBGI-Qingdao, No. 2877, Tuanjie Road, Sino-German Ecopark, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China.
Lianfu ChenState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Benhua FeiState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Kai HanBGI-Qingdao, No. 2877, Tuanjie Road, Sino-German Ecopark, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China.
Rongsheng LiResearch Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangshanyi Rd, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510000, China.
Chengcheng ShiBGI-Qingdao, No. 2877, Tuanjie Road, Sino-German Ecopark, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China.
Huayu SunState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Sining WangState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Hao XuState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Kebin YangState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Xiurong XuState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Xuemeng ShanState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Jingjing ShiState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Aiqin FengBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Building No. 7, BGI Park, No. 21 Hongan 3rd Street, Yantian District, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Guangyi FanBGI-Qingdao, No. 2877, Tuanjie Road, Sino-German Ecopark, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China.
Xin LiuBGI-Qingdao, No. 2877, Tuanjie Road, Sino-German Ecopark, Qingdao, Shandong 266555, China.
Shancen ZhaoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Building No. 7, BGI Park, No. 21 Hongan 3rd Street, Yantian District, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Chi ZhangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Building No. 7, BGI Park, No. 21 Hongan 3rd Street, Yantian District, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Qiang GaoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Building No. 7, BGI Park, No. 21 Hongan 3rd Street, Yantian District, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Zhimin GaoState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
Zehui JiangState Forestry Administration Key Open Laboratory on the Science and Technology of Bamboo and Rattan, Institute of Gene Science for Bamboo and Rattan Resources, International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Futongdong Rd, WangJing, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100102, China.
International Bamboo and Rattan Organization · CNBGI Group (China) · CNFuyang Normal University · CNResearch Institute of Tropical Forestry · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Calamus simplicifolius and Daemonorops jenkinsiana are two representative rattans, the most significant material sources for the rattan industry. However, the lack of reference genome sequences is a major obstacle for basic and applied biology on rattan. Findings: We produced two chromosome-level genome assemblies of C. simplicifolius and D. jenkinsiana using Illumina, Pacific Biosciences, and Hi-C sequencing data. A total of ∼730 Gb and ∼682 Gb of raw data covered the predicted genome lengths (∼1.98 Gb of C. simplicifolius and ∼1.61 Gb of D. jenkinsiana) to ∼372 × and ∼426 × read depths, respectively. The two de novo genome assemblies, ∼1.94 Gb and ∼1.58 Gb, were generated with scaffold N50s of ∼160 Mb and ∼119 Mb in C. simplicifolius and D. jenkinsiana, respectively. The C. simplicifolius and D. jenkinsiana genomes were predicted to harbor  51,235 and  53,342 intact protein-coding gene models, respectively. Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs evaluation demonstrated that genome completeness reached 96.4% and 91.3% in the C. simplicifolius and D. jenkinsiana genomes, respectively. Genome evolution showed that four Arecaceae plants clustered together, and the divergence time between the two rattans was ∼19.3 million years ago. Additionally, we identified 193 and 172 genes involved in the lignin biosynthesis pathway in the C. simplicifolius and D. jenkinsiana genomes, respectively. Conclusions: We present the first de novo assemblies of two rattan genomes (C. simplicifolius and D. jenkinsiana). These data will not only provide a fundamental resource for functional genomics, particularly in promoting germplasm utilization for breeding, but also serve as reference genomes for comparative studies between and among different species.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantCalamusChromosomes, Plant

Identifiers

PMID30101322
PMCPMC6117794
OpenAlexW2887458276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.