ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018
Developing and maintaining clinical decision support using clinical knowledge and machine learning: the case of order sets.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inclusion of Clinicians in the Development and Evaluation of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Tools: A Systematic Literature Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- Machine learning models for synthesizing actionable care decisions on lower extremity wounds.Smart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Article
- When order sets do not align with clinician workflow: assessing practice patterns in the electronic health record.BMJ quality & safety · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development and maintenance of order sets is a knowledge-intensive task for off-the-shelf machine-learning algorithms alone. We hypothesize that integrating clinical knowledge with machine learning can facilitate effective development and maintenance of order sets while promoting best practices in ordering. To this end, we simulated the revision of an "AM Lab Order Set" under 6 revision approaches. Revisions included changes in the order set content or default settings through 1) population statistics, 2) individualized prediction using machine learning, and 3) clinical knowledge. Revision criteria were determined using electronic health record (EHR) data from 2014 to 2015. Each revision's clinical appropriateness, workload from using the order set, and generalizability across time were evaluated using EHR data from 2016 and 2017. Our results suggest a potential order set revision approach that jointly leverages clinical knowledge and machine learning to improve usability while updating contents based on latest clinical knowledge and best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.