Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101192›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

The environmental niche of the global high seas pelagic longline fleet.

Guillermo Ortuño Crespo, Daniel C Dunn, Gabriel Reygondeau, Kristina Boerder, Boris Worm, William Cheung, Derek P Tittensor, Patrick N Halpin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hot spots of unseen fishing vessels.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guillermo Ortuño CrespoMarine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Daniel C DunnMarine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-0681
Gabriel ReygondeauNippon Foundation Nereus Program and Changing Ocean Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9074-625X
Kristina BoerderDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada.
Boris WormDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-8716
William CheungNippon Foundation Nereus Program and Changing Ocean Research Unit, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3626-1045
Derek P TittensorDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada.
Patrick N HalpinMarine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5845-3588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International interest in the protection and sustainable use of high seas biodiversity has grown in recent years. There is an opportunity for new technologies to enable improvements in management of these areas beyond national jurisdiction. We explore the spatial ecology and drivers of the global distribution of the high seas longline fishing fleet by creating predictive models of the distribution of fishing effort from newly available automatic identification system (AIS) data. Our results show how longline fishing effort can be predicted using environmental variables, many related to the expected distribution of the species targeted by longliners. We also find that the longline fleet has seasonal environmental preferences (for example, increased importance of cooler surface waters during boreal summer) and may only be using 38 to 64% of the available environmentally suitable fishing habitat. Possible explanations include misclassification of fishing effort, incomplete AIS coverage, or how potential range contractions of pelagic species may have reduced the abundance of fishing habitats in the open ocean.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesSeasonsAnimalsEcosystemEnvironmental ExposureFisheriesFishesGeographyOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID30101192
PMCPMC6082651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.