Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30101029›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2018

Coexistence of adenomyosis, adenocarcinoma, endometrial and myometrial lesions in resected uterine specimens.

Seza Tetikkurt, Elif Çelik, Hazal Taş, Tuğçe Cay, Selman Işik, Abdullah Taner Usta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seza TetikkurtDepartment of Pathology, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul 34200, Turkey.
Elif ÇelikDepartment of Pathology, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul 34200, Turkey.
Hazal TaşDepartment of Pathology, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul 34200, Turkey.
Tuğçe CayDepartment of Pathology, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul 34200, Turkey.
Selman IşikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul 34200, Turkey.
Abdullah Taner UstaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Acıbadem University, Istanbul 34718, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAcıbadem University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was conducted to identify endometrial and myometrial lesions coexisting with adenomyosis, and to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of endometrial adenocarcinomas associated with adenomyosis. A retrospective analysis of the resected uterine specimens of 319 patients with adenomyosis admitted between January 1, 2014 and August 1, 2017 was performed. The endometrial and myometrial lesions coexisting with adenomyosis were evaluated. The clinicopathological prognostic factors, including tumor grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space involvement, lymph node invasion, pathological stage and recurrence, were analysed. For data analysis, the Chi-squared test was used and a P-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences. The mean age of the patients was 52.1 years. A total of 32 patients had endometrial carcinoma associated with adenomyosis. In addition to endometrioid adenocarcinoma of different grades, rare clear cell carcinoma cases were also observed. Two cases of malignant mesenchymal tumors (one low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and one leiomyosarcoma) were also diagnosed. Therefore, patients presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding should undergo thorough evaluation for the presence of adenomyosis and/or leiomyoma(s). Although the cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma associated with adenomyosis generally had a good prognostic outcome, there were also rare cases of patients with agressive tumor morphology. The inflammatory and tissue response arising around the foci of adenomyosis generate a preventive mechanism against the invasion of adenocarcinomas coexisting with adenomyosis. This response is likely the primary mechanism underlying the good clinical course of these tumors. Therefore, the presence of adenomyosis may be an important factor for the determination of prognosis.

Indexed as

adenomyosisendometrial adenocarcinomaendometrioid adenocarcinomaleiomyomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30101029
PMCPMC6083418
OpenAlexW2807868352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.