Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30100988›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Non-invasive visualization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a pilot study.

Svetomir N Markovic, Filippo Galli, Vera J Suman, Wendy K Nevala, Andrew M Paulsen, Joseph C Hung, Denise N Gansen, Lori A Erickson, Paolo Marchetti, Gregory A Wiseman and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Imaging the fate of CAR-T cellsFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Molecular imaging to support cancer immunotherapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Svetomir N MarkovicDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Filippo GalliNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Vera J SumanDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Wendy K NevalaDepartment of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andrew M PaulsenDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joseph C HungDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Denise N GansenDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lori A EricksonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Paolo MarchettiOncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, and IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Gregory A WisemanDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alberto SignoreNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USSapienza University of Rome · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USWinnMed · US

Funding

IL-2 scintigraphy as a guide to cancer immunotherapyR21CA170062 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MARKOVIC, SVETOMIR NENAD · 2012 to 2013
$631k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA170062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early in the course of immunotherapy there is frequently a transient enlargement of tumor masses (pseudo-progression) due to tumor infiltration by TILs. Current clinical imaging modalities are not able to distinguished pseudo-progression from true tumor progression. Thus, patients often remain on treatment 4-8 weeks longer to confirm disease progression. Nuclear medicine offers the possibility to image immune cells and potentially discriminate pseudo-progression and progression. We conducted a pilot study in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving ipilimumab (IPI) or pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) to assess safety and feasibility of SPECT/CT imaging with

Indexed as

99mTc-IL2check point inhibitorsipilimumabmelanomapembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID30100988
PMCPMC6084386
OpenAlexW2884934764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.