ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2018
[Psychological distress in medical and paramedical personnel in anesthesia and intensive care].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explicative factors of occupational stress among caregivers in hospitals in Brazzaville: a cross-sectional analytical study.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- [Psychological stress during the COVID-19 pandemic: consequences for psychiatric patients and therapeutic implications].Der Nervenarzt · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anesthesia and intensive care medicine is considered one of the specialties involving more professional stress (PS). On this basis, our study aimed to assess the level of anxiety and PS in the personnel in anesthesia and intensive care and to identify the associated factors. We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study including 54 participants (38 technicians and 16 residents) working in the Departments of Anesthesia and Intensive Care at Habib Bourguiba and Hedi Chaker University Hospitals, Sfax, Tunisia. PS assessment was performed using the Karasek questionnaire. The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) was used to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms. According to the Karasek questionnaire, the average decision latitude score was 69, the average psychological demand score was 23.9 and the average social support score was 19.6. According to this questionnaire, 40.7% of personnel was stressed and 38.9% was in isostrain condition. Average HARS score was 17.8, average psychic anxiety score was 8.7 and average somatic anxiety score was 9, with a significant difference between the medical and paramedical personnel. Severe to very severe anxiety was recorded in 25.9% of cases. HARS score was correlated to female gender (p=0.017) and to psychiatric histories (p=0.003). This study highlights that medical and paramedical personnel in anesthesia and intensive care is exposed to a significant risk of PS. Changes in working environment as well as learning professional stress management techniques should be proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.