ReviewNuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018
Emerging Tracers for Nuclear Cardiac PET Imaging.
Review in Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Correlation Between Epicardial Adipose Tissue and PET Cardiac Perfusion: A Systematic Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- PET imaging of mitochondrial complex-I in the adenine-induced tubulointerstitial nephropathy mouse model using [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025Article
- First performance evaluation of easyPET.3D, a high-resolution and cost-effective benchtop preclinical PET scanner.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- KSNM60: The History of Radiopharmaceutical Sciences in Korea.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial perfusion imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) has several advantages over single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The recent advances in SPECT technology have shown promise, but there is still a large need for PET in the clinical management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Especially, absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) using PET is extremely important. In spite of considerable advances in the diagnosis of CAD, novel PET radiopharmaceuticals remain necessary for the diagnosis of CAD because clinical use of current cardiac radiotracers is limited by their physical characteristics, such as decay mode, emission energy, and half-life. Thus, the use of a radioisotope that has proper characteristics and a proper half-life to develop myocardial perfusion agents could overcome these limitations. In this review, the current state of cardiac PET and a general overview of novel
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.