Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30100705›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Cone photoreceptor macular function and recovery after photostress in early non-exudative age-related macular degeneration.

John D Rodriguez, Keith Lane, David A Hollander, Aron Shapiro, Sunita Saigal, Andrew J Hertsenberg, Garrick Wallstrom, Divya Narayanan, Endri Angjeli, Mark B Abelson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John D RodriguezOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
Keith LaneOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
David A HollanderOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
Aron ShapiroOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
Sunita SaigalOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
Andrew J HertsenbergOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
Garrick WallstromStatistics and Data Corporation, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Divya NarayananOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
Endri AngjeliOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
Mark B AbelsonOra, Inc., Andover, MA, USA, jrodriguez@oraclinical.com.
Andover Eye Associates · USHarvard University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify parameters from cone function and recovery after photostress that detect functional deficits in early non-exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to determine the repeatability of these parameters.

methodsCone-mediated visual function recovery after photostress was examined in three groups of subjects: young normal subjects (ages 20-29; N=8), older normal subjects (ages 50-90; N=9), and early non-exudative AMD subjects (ages 50-90; N=12). Eight AMD and four normal subjects were retested 1 year after the initial evaluation. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) and parameters of cone function (baseline cone sensitivity and cone recovery half-life following photobleach) were measured and compared between AMD and normal subjects. Short-term repeatability was assessed for each subject's initial evaluation. Long-term repeatability was assessed by comparing outcomes from the initial evaluation and 1-year follow-up.

resultsThe mean baseline cone threshold was significantly worse in subjects with early AMD compared to older normal subjects (-1.80±0.04 vs -1.57±0.06 log cd/m

conclusionThe baseline cone threshold shows potential as a novel parameter to assess visual dysfunction in early AMD. This outcome consistently detected deficits in AMD subjects, and differentiated them from age-matched controls with high test-retest repeatability.

Indexed as

AMDcone recoveryOra LUXphotobleachphotoreceptor

Identifiers

PMID30100705
PMCPMC6067527
OpenAlexW2884838869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.