Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30100698›Full record

ArticleJournal of child and family studies2018

Addressing Barriers to Recruitment and Retention in the Implementation of Parenting Programs: Lessons Learned for Effective Program Delivery in Rural and Urban Areas.

Paul Smokowski, Rosalie Corona, Martica Bacallao, Beverly L Fortson, Khiya J Marshall, Anna Yaros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child and family studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Literature Review of Digital Behavioral Parent Training Programs for Parents of Adolescents.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paul SmokowskiSchool of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Rosalie CoronaVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Martica BacallaoUniversity of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Beverly L FortsonDivision of Violence Prevention, National Center forInjury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Khiya J MarshallDivision of Violence Prevention, National Center forInjury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anna YarosVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control · USRTI International · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Kansas · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

VCU ACE: Evaluation of a Comprehensive Approach to Youth Violence PreventionU01CE001956 · CE · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI FARRELL, ALBERT D · 2010 to 2014
$5.8M
North Carolina Rural Academic Center for Excellence in Youth Violence PreventionU01CE001948 · CE · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MARSHALL, STEVEN W · 2010 to 2014
$5.8M
NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE001948NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE001956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of family-based programs for reducing adolescent risk behaviors and promoting adolescent health; however, parent engagement, specifically in terms of recruitment and retention, remains a consistent challenge. Recruitment rates for family-based prevention programs range from 3 to 35%, while, on average, 28% of caregivers drop out before program completion. Thus, engagement of parents in prevention programming is of utmost concern to ensure families and youth benefit from implementation of family-based programs. In this manuscript, two Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded projects share their experiences with engagement of parents in violence prevention programs. Problems related to parent engagement are reviewed, as are structural, attitudinal, and interpersonal barriers specific to recruitment and retention. Examples of successful implementation strategies identified across urban and rural sites are also analyzed and lessons learned are provided.

Indexed as

Family check-upParenting wiselyRecruitmentRetentionStaying connected with your teen

Identifiers

PMID30100698
PMCPMC6084790
OpenAlexW2807750555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.