ArticleIntelligence
Reaction times match IQ for major causes of mortality: Evidence from a population based prospective cohort study.
Article in Intelligence. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genome-wide association study in 404,302 individuals identifies 7 significant loci for reaction time variability.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- The effects of barbell resistance exercise on information processing speed and conflict-related ERP in older adults: a crossover randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Capturing trial-by-trial variability in behaviour: people with Parkinson's disease exhibit a greater rate of short-term fluctuations in response times.Translational psychiatry · 2025Article
- Health literacy in relation to web-based measurement of cognitive function in the home: UK Women's Cohort Study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Patients with Darier Disease Exhibit Cognitive Impairment while Patients with Hailey-Hailey Disease Do Not: An Experimental, Matched Case-control Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2021Article
- How does cognitive function measured by the reaction time and critical flicker fusion frequency correlate with the academic performance of students?BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Individual Differences in Performance Speed Are Associated With a Positivity/Negativity Bias. An ERP and Behavioral Study.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- Cognitive and White-Matter Compartment Models Reveal Selective Relations between Corticospinal Tract Microstructure and Simple Reaction Time.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Basal forebrain cholinergic system volume is associated with general cognitive ability in the elderly.Neuropsychologia · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe association of premorbid cognitive ability with all-cause mortality is now well established. However, since all-cause mortality is relatively uninformative about aetiology, evidence has been sought, and is beginning to accumulate, for associations with specific causes of mortality. Likewise, the underlying causal pathways may be illuminated by considering associations with different measures of cognitive ability. For example, critics of IQ type measures point to possible cultural or social biases and there is, consequently, a need for more culturally neutral measures such as reaction times. We examine the associations of cognitive ability with major causes of mortality, including: cardiovascular disease, cancer and respiratory disease and compare the results for a standard IQ test, the Alice Heim 4 (AH4), with those for simple and four-choice reaction times.
methodsData were derived from the oldest cohort of the West of Scotland Twenty-07 Study. Participants were randomly sampled from the Central Clydeside Conurbation, a mainly urban area centred on Glasgow city. At baseline, aged 56, they were interviewed in their homes by trained interviewers; the AH4 was administered and reaction times measured using a portable electronic device. Vital status was ascertained via linkage to the NHS central register. Cox regression was used in SAS 9.4 for the main analyses. Adjustments were made for sex, smoking status and social class.
resultsFull data on AH4, RT and covariates were available for 1350 out of 1551. During 29 years of follow-up, there were 833 deaths: 279 cardiovascular disease (CVD) (168 CHD; 68 stroke); 291 cancer; 97 respiratory disease; 42 digestive disease; and 39 dementia. The 85 remaining deaths were a heterogeneous mixture with no cause accounting for more than 14.AH4 scores were associated with most major causes. Digestive disease and dementia had similar effect sizes but were not significant. Within cardiovascular disease, there was an association with coronary heart disease but not stroke. The association with cancer was primarily due to those cancers related to smoking.RT measures were mostly associated with the same causes of death. Where significant, effects were in the same directions and of similar magnitude. That is, lower AH4 scores, longer reaction times, and more variable reaction times were all associated with increased mortality risk from the major causes of death. A summary measure of RT outperformed the AH4 for most causes.
conclusionThe association between intelligence with mortality from the major causes is also seen with reaction times. That effect sizes are of similar magnitude is suggestive of a common cause. It also implies that the association of cognitive ability with mortality is unlikely to be due to any social, cultural or educational biases that are sometimes ascribed to intelligence measures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.