Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30099969›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2018

How do pig farms maintain low Salmonella prevalence: a case-control study.

R P Smith, V Andres, T E Cheney, F Martelli, R Gosling, E Marier, A Rabie, D Gilson, R H Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Biosecurity measures reducingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effective reduction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Comparative Analysis ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R P SmithAnimal and Plant Health Agency,Woodham Lane,New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3NB,UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6871-4673
V AndresAnimal and Plant Health Agency,Woodham Lane,New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3NB,UK.
T E CheneyAnimal and Plant Health Agency,Woodham Lane,New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3NB,UK.
F MartelliAnimal and Plant Health Agency,Woodham Lane,New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3NB,UK.
R GoslingAnimal and Plant Health Agency,Woodham Lane,New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3NB,UK.
E MarierVeterinary Medicine Directorate,Woodham Lane,New Haw,Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3LS,UK.
A RabieAnimal and Plant Health Agency,Woodham Lane,New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3NB,UK.
D GilsonAnimal and Plant Health Agency,Woodham Lane,New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3NB,UK.
R H DaviesAnimal and Plant Health Agency,Woodham Lane,New Haw, Addlestone,Surrey KT15 3NB,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella prevalence in UK pigs is amongst the highest in Europe, highlighting the need to investigate pig farms which have managed to maintain a low Salmonella seroprevalence. A total of 19 pig farms that had a consistently low (<10%) seroprevalence over 4 years (named Platinum farms) were compared against 38 randomly selected Control farms, chosen to match the same distribution of production types and geographical distribution of the Platinum farms. Each farm was visited and floor faeces and environmental samples were collected. It was shown that Control farms had a significantly higher median percentage of pooled faecal samples positive for Salmonella compared with the Platinum farms (12.1% and 0.4% for pooled faecal samples, respectively) and were more likely to have serovars of public health importance detected (S. Typhimurium/ monophasic variants or S. Enteritidis). Considering the comprehensive on-farm sampling, the identification of farms negative for Salmonella, along with the identification of those that had maintained low prevalence over a long period is important. The risk factor analyses identified pelleted feed, feed deliveries crossing farm perimeter and regular antibiotic use as associated with being a Control farm. Performance data indicated that Platinum farms were performing better for slaughter live weight than Controls. Limited assessments of available pig movement records suggested that the source of pigs was not key to Platinum status, but further study would be needed to confirm this finding. These results emphasise that maintaining very low prevalence on UK farms is achievable.

Indexed as

FarmsAnimalsCase-Control StudiesFecesPrevalenceRisk FactorsSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSerogroupSwineSwine DiseasesUnited KingdomPigrisk factorSalmonellasupplier

Identifiers

PMID30099969
PMCPMC6452989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.