Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30099961›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018

Characterization of Factors Affecting the Detection Limit of EGFR p.T790M in Circulating Tumor DNA.

Ibrahim Fahoum, Relly Forer, Dina Volodarsky, Inna Vulih, Tova Bick, Shada Sarji, Zeev Bamberger, Ofer Ben-Izhak, Edmond Sabo, Ruth Hershberg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ibrahim Fahoum1 Department of Pathology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Relly Forer2 Dyn Diagnostics, Assaf Harofeh Hospital, Zriffin, Israel.
Dina Volodarsky2 Dyn Diagnostics, Assaf Harofeh Hospital, Zriffin, Israel.
Inna Vulih2 Dyn Diagnostics, Assaf Harofeh Hospital, Zriffin, Israel.
Tova Bick3 Department of Pathology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Shada Sarji3 Department of Pathology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Zeev Bamberger3 Department of Pathology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Ofer Ben-Izhak3 Department of Pathology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Edmond Sabo3 Department of Pathology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Ruth Hershberg4 Technion Integrative Cancer Center at the Ruth (TICC) and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Dov Hershkovitz1 Department of Pathology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2811-8647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCirculating tumor DNA is a promising noninvasive tool for cancer monitoring. One of the challenges in applying this tool is the detection of low-frequency mutations. The detection limit of these mutations varies between different molecular methods. The aim of this study is to characterize the factors affecting the limit of detection for epidermal growth factor receptor p.T790M mutation in circulating tumor DNA of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

methodsDNA was extracted from plasma samples of 102 patients. For sequencing the DNA, we used 2 different next-generation sequencing-based platforms: Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (56 cases) and Roche/454 (46 cases). Serially diluted synthetic DNA samples carrying the p.T790M mutation were sequenced using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine for validation. Limit of detection was determined through the analysis of non-hot-spot nonreference reads, which were regarded as sequencing artifacts.

resultsThe frequency of the non-hot-spot nonreference reads was higher in Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine compared to Roche/454 (0.07% ± 0.08% and 0.03% ± 0.06%, respectively, P < .001). We found that different base type substitutions occur with different frequency. Since the base substitution leading to p.T790M mutation is C>T transition, its frequency was used to determine the limit of detection for the assay. Based on the C>T non-hot-spot nonreference allele frequency, we found that the limit of detection is 0.18% in Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine and 0.1% in Roche/454. Based on these values, 48% and 56% of the cases were positive for T790M mutation in Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine and Roche/454 groups, respectively. Agreement between duplicates was 76% in Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine and 72% in Roche/454. Using serially diluted synthetic DNA samples carrying the p.T790M mutation, we could identify mutations with allele frequency of 0.18% or more using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine, supporting our approach to determine the detection limit.

conclusionBoth the sequencing platform and the specific nucleotide change affect the limit of detection and should therefore be determined in the validation process of new assays.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungCirculating Tumor DNAErbB ReceptorsGene FrequencyHumansLimit of DetectionLung NeoplasmsMutationCirculating Tumor DNAEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptorscirculating tumor DNAdetection limitEGFRnext-generation sequencingp.T790M

Identifiers

PMID30099961
PMCPMC6090485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.