Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30099837›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2019

Adolescent parenthood associated with adverse socio-economic outcomes at age 30 years in women and men of the Pelotas, Brazil: 1982 Birth Cohort Study.

D P Gigante, Gva de França, E De Lucia Rolfe, N P Lima, J V Dos Santos Motta, H Gonçalves, B L Horta, F C Barros, K K Ong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adverse Perinatal Outcomes among Adolescent Pregnant Women Living with HIV: A Propensity-Score-Matched Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Provision and Guidance for Postpartum Contraception - Ensuring Reproductive Rights during Times of Crises.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D P GigantePost-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Gva de FrançaPost-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
E De Lucia RolfeMedical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
N P LimaPost-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
J V Dos Santos MottaPost-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
H GonçalvesPost-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
B L HortaPost-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
F C BarrosPost-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
K K OngMedical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Brazilian Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-Brazil)European Union, the United Nations Development Fund for WomenInternational Development Research Centre (Canada)Medical Research Council MC_UU_12015/2Ministry of Health (Brazil)National Program for Centres of Excellence (PRONEX)Overseas Development Administration (currently the Department for International Development, UK)Pastorate of the Child (Brazil)Rio Grande do Sul State Research Support Foundation (FAPERGS)Wellcome TrustWHO (Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development and Human Reproduction Programme)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the potential long-term effects of adolescent parenthood on completed education and income.

designPopulation-based birth cohort study.

settingAll live births in 1982, whose mothers lived in the urban area of Pelotas, southern Brazil. SAMPLE: A total of 3701 participants: 1914 women and 1787 men at age 30 years.

methodsQuestionnaires were completed by the mothers in the early phases of this study, and by the cohort members in adolescence and adulthood. Linear regression models and G-computation were used in the analyses.

main outcome measuresEducational attainment and income at age 30 years.

resultsIn women, adolescent parenthood was associated with lower attained education compared with women without adolescent maternity: by -2.8 years [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.2 to -2.3] if their first birth was at age 16-19, and by -4.4 years (-5.5 to -3.3) at age 11-15. These effects were greater among women who had three or more children. Women with adolescent parenthood also had 49 or 33% lower income at age 30 if their first child was born when aged 16-19 or 11-15, respectively. In men, the adverse effect of adolescent parenthood on education appeared to be mediated by a higher number of children and there was no effect of adolescent paternity on income at age 30 years.

conclusionThese findings suggest lasting socio-economic disadvantages of adolescent parenthood, with larger effects being apparent in women than in men. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Adolescent parenthood has an adverse effect on educational attainment later in life, and on household income among women.

Indexed as

Educational StatusParentsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBrazilCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncomeLinear ModelsMalePregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceSex FactorsAdolescentcohort studieseducationincomeparents

Identifiers

PMID30099837
PMCPMC6774777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.