Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30099743›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2018

HIV/AIDS Vaccines: 2018.

Harriet L Robinson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Latency Reversal and Clearance of Persistent HIV Infection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Novel Antiretroviral Therapeutic Strategies for HIV.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harriet L RobinsonGeoVax, Inc., Smyrna, Georgia, USA.
GeoVax (United States) · US

Funding

Enhancing protective antibody responses for a DNA/MVA HIV vaccineR44AI106422 · NIAID · GEOVAX, INC. · PI ROBINSON, HARRIET L · 2016 to 2017
$1.4M
Enhancing protective antibody responses for a GM-CSF adjuvanted HIV vaccineR43AI106422 · NIAID · GEOVAX, INC. · PI ROBINSON, HARRIET L · 2013 to 2014
$566k
NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI106422NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI106422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has infected 76 million people and killed an estimated 35 million. During its 40-year history, remarkable progress has been made on antiretroviral drugs. Progress toward a vaccine has also been made, although this has yet to deliver a licensed product. In 2007, I wrote a review, HIV AIDS Vaccines: 2007. This review, HIV AIDS Vaccines: 2018, focuses on the progress in the past 11 years. I begin with key challenges for the development of an AIDS vaccine and the lessons learned from the six completed efficacy trials, only one of which has met with some success.

Indexed as

Research DesignAIDS VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingClinical Trials as TopicDrug DevelopmentGenotypeHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensHIV InfectionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMutationPhenotypeAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingHIV AntibodiesHIV Antigens

Identifiers

PMID30099743
PMCPMC6282490
OpenAlexW2915592399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.