Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30099664›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

PharmAdhere: training German community pharmacists with Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.

Anna Laven, Maira Anna Deters, Olaf Rose, Holger Schwender, Alexandra Smaranda, Isabell Waltering, Stephanie Laeer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna LavenInstitute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany. anna.laven@hhu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4405-2462
Maira Anna DetersInstitute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Olaf RoseCollege of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Holger SchwenderMathematical Institute, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Alexandra SmarandaServicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, Madrid, Spain.
Isabell WalteringInstitute of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Westfaelische Wilhelms-University, Muenster, Germany.
Stephanie LaeerInstitute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHospital Central de la Cruz Roja San José y Santa Adela · ESUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

Participants 14950 €Pharmabrain GmbH 5500 €
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Pharmacists who engage in Pharmaceutical Care need skills to optimise responsible medication use and increase medication adherence. Objectives We developed and evaluated a blended-learning programme for German community pharmacists that focused on conducting consultations in chronic diseases. Setting Community pharmacists in Germany. Method Interventional study with pre-post design. We combined e-learning with Objective Standardised Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) for emergency situations, initiation/implementation of medication therapy and detection of symptoms of four chronic diseases. Specific procedures were defined in the Pharmaceutical Action Plan. Skills were measured with a global analytical marking sheet derived from the Medication Related Consultation Framework and scored with the Canadian criticality/relevancy matrix. Time limits matched real practice scenarios. Main outcome measures Changes in knowledge (difference of test results before and after e-learning) and changes in skills (difference in scores of the OSCEs before and after training). Results 22 out of the 26 pharmacists enrolled, completed the study. The number of correctly answered questions increased significantly after the e-learning for all four indications with a mean number of additional correct answers between 3.86 and 4.9 points out of 15 (p < 0.001). The sums of the analytical checklist points in percentages increased significantly in all topics from the baseline summative OSCE to the final summative OSCE between 6.14 and 31.85% (p < 0.001). The maximum duration of consultation per patient was less than 10 min in all OSCEs. Conclusion The use of e-learning and OSCEs was well received by participants and is a successful method to deliver practical Pharmaceutical Care training.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAdultChronic DiseaseCommunity Pharmacy ServicesCounselingEducational MeasurementEducation, Pharmacy, ContinuingFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPharmacistsProfessional RoleTime FactorsAdherenceBlended learningCommunity pharmacy servicesContinuing educationCounselingEducationGermanyPharmaceutical carePharmacy

Identifiers

PMID30099664
OpenAlexW2885990633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.