Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30099656›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2020

A Comparison Between Two Screening Approaches for ASD Among Toddlers in Israel.

Orly Kerub, Eric J Haas, Gal Meiri, Nadav Davidovitch, Idan Menashe

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Association Between Early Developmental Milestones and Autism Spectrum Disorder.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Orly KerubDepartment of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Eric J HaasMinistry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gal MeiriPre-School Psychiatry Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Nadav DavidovitchDepartment of Health Systems Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Idan MenashePublic Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel. idanmen@bgu.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1961-1461

Funding

Israel Science Foundation 527/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic screening of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can improve early diagnosis of ASD. We compared the efficacy of two ASD screening methods, the Global Developmental Screening (GDS), and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised, with Follow-Up (M-CHAT/F) in 1591 toddlers of ages 18-36 months from 35 government-funded clinics in south Israel. The M-CHAT/F performed better than the GDS in detecting toddlers with ASD (sensitivity: 70.0% vs. 50.0%, and specificity: 98.2% vs. 96.6% respectively). Both methods had an equivalent performance in detecting other forms of developmental delays (sensitivity = 63%; and specificity ~ 98%). In addition, remarkable inter-nurse variation was observed in the GDS referral decisions. Thus, employment of the M-CHAT/F in the Israeli health system may improve early detection of ASD among toddlers.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderChecklistChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantIsraelMaleMass ScreeningObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAutism spectrum disorderM-CHATScreeningToddlers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.