Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30099655›Full record

Observational studyClinical rheumatology2019

Comparative efficacy between adalimumab and infliximab in the treatment of non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis: a retrospective observational study of 107 patients.

Claudia Fabiani, Antonio Vitale, Donato Rigante, Giacomo Emmi, Alice Bitossi, Giuseppe Lopalco, Jurgen Sota, Silvana Guerriero, Ida Orlando, Stefano Gentileschi and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent Insights into the Management of Behçet Syndrome.Journal of inflammation research · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Biotherapies in Uveitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia FabianiOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. claudia.fabiani@gmail.com.
Antonio VitaleResearch Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet's Disease and Rheumatology-Ophthalmology Collaborative Uveitis Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Donato RiganteInstitute of Pediatrics, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli I.R.C.C.S, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo EmmiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alice BitossiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe LopalcoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Jurgen SotaResearch Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet's Disease and Rheumatology-Ophthalmology Collaborative Uveitis Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Silvana GuerrieroDepartment of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Ida OrlandoResearch Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet's Disease and Rheumatology-Ophthalmology Collaborative Uveitis Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Stefano GentileschiResearch Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet's Disease and Rheumatology-Ophthalmology Collaborative Uveitis Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Florenzo IannoneInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Bruno FredianiResearch Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet's Disease and Rheumatology-Ophthalmology Collaborative Uveitis Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Mauro GaleazziResearch Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet's Disease and Rheumatology-Ophthalmology Collaborative Uveitis Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy.
Lorenzo VannozziDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, Eye Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Gian Marco TosiOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Luca CantariniResearch Center of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases and Behçet's Disease and Rheumatology-Ophthalmology Collaborative Uveitis Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico "Le Scotte", viale Bracci 1, 53100, Siena, Italy. cantariniluca@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7352-1275
University of Siena · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) in patients with non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis. Demographic, clinical, instrumental, and therapeutic data from patients enrolled were collected at the start of treatment, at 12-month follow-up, and at the last follow-up assessment. One hundred seven patients (46 females, 187 eyes) were enrolled, 66 (61.7%) treated with ADA and 41 (38.3%) with IFX. Bilateral involvement was observed in 80 cases. The mean follow-up was 26.45 ± 21.71 months for ADA patients and 56.60 ± 56.04 months for IFX patients. The overall decrease of uveitis frequency during the first 12 months of treatment was 66.7% in the IFX group and 84.2% in the ADA group, compared to the previous 12 months (p = 0.09). A significantly higher corticosteroid dosage was found among patients treated with ADA at the last follow-up visit (p = 0.008). The percentage of patients co-administered with corticosteroids was significantly higher among ADA patients both at the 12-month visit (p = 0.03) and at the last visit (p = 0.0004). The frequency of uveitic macular edema (UME) was significantly higher among patients treated with ADA compared to those treated with IFX at the 12-month assessment (p = 0.015) and at the last follow-up visit (p = 0.011); central macular thickness was significantly higher in ADA group compared to the IFX group at the last follow-up assessment (p = 0.04). ADA and IFX have shown a similar efficacy in controlling uveitis relapses, but IFX showed a more pronounced corticosteroid sparing effect and a significantly higher capacity in resolving UME compared to ADA.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultBehcet SyndromeFemaleHumansInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedRetinal VasculitisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaUveitis, IntermediateUveitis, PosteriorAdalimumabInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaBehçet’s diseaseMacular edemaRetinal vasculitisTNF-blocking antibodiesUveitis

Identifiers

PMID30099655
OpenAlexW2886635736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.