ArticleLung2018
Risk Stratification in Patients with Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyema Using the RAPID Score.
Article in Lung, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- What is new in pleural infections?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Association between serial changes in serum C-reactive protein levels and mortality among patients with pleural empyema: a database research.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Utility of RAPID score in parapneumonic effusion or empyema: A prospective study at a tertiary centre.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance of pleural fluid microbiological positivity in pleural infection: a bicentric 10-year retrospective observational study.Respiratory research · 2025Observational
- Infective Pleural Effusions-A Comprehensive Narrative Review Article.Clinics and practice · 2024Review
- Association between Empirical Anti-Pseudomonal Antibiotics and Progression to Thoracic Surgery and Death in Empyema: Database Research.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Role of RAPID score and surgery in the management of pleural infection: a single center retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors of community-acquired pneumonia complicated by parapneumonic pleural effusion in elderly patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- The role of the RAPID score in surgical planning for empyema.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Pleural Space Infections.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Preoperative undernutrition predicts postoperative complications of acute empyema.Health science reports · 2021Article
- From Bedside to the Bench-A Call for Novel Approaches to Prognostic Evaluation and Treatment of Empyema.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeComplicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema are a leading cause of morbidity in the United States with over 1 million admissions annually and a mortality rate that remains high in spite of recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. The identification of high risk patients is crucial for improved management and the provision of cost-effective care. The RAPID score is a scoring system comprised of the following variables: renal function, age, purulence, infection source, and dietary factors and has been shown to predict outcomes in patients with pleural space infections.
methodsIn a single center retrospective study, we evaluated 98 patients with complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema who had tube thoracostomy (with or without Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy) and assessed treatment success rates, mortality, length of hospital stay, and direct hospitalization costs stratified by three RAPID score categories: low-risk (0-2), medium risk (3-4), and high-risk (5-7) groups.
resultsTreatment success rate was 71%, and the 90 day mortality rate was 12%. There was a positive-graded association between the low, medium and high RAPID score categories and mortality, (5.3%, 8.3% and 22.6%, respectively), length of hospital stay (10, 21, 19 days, respectively), and direct hospitalization costs ($19,909, $36,317 and $43,384, respectively).
conclusionOur findings suggest that the RAPID score is a robust tool which could be used to identify patients with complicated parapneumonic effusions and empyema who may be at an increased risk of mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and who may incur a higher cost of treatment. Randomized controlled trials identifying the most effective initial treatment modality for medium- and high-risk patients are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30099584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.